Abstract

Glyphosate is a synthesis product and chemical substance that entered in the global market during the 70s. In the beginning, the molecule was used as an active principle in a wide range of herbicides, with great success. This was mainly due to its systemic and non-selective action against vegetable organisms and also to the spread of Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) crops, which over the years were specifically created with a resistance to glyphosate. To date, the product is, for these reasons, the most sprayed and most used herbicide in the world. Because of its widespread diffusion into the environment, it was not long before glyphosate found itself at the center of an important scientific debate about its adverse effects on health and environment. In fact, in 2015 the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France), an organization referred to as the specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization (WHO, Geneva, Switzerland), classified the substance as “likely carcinogenic” to humans. This triggered an immediate and negative reaction from the producer, who accused the Agency and claimed that they had failed to carry out their studies properly and that these conclusions were largely contradictory to published research. Additionally, in 2015, just a few months after the IARC monography published on glyphosate, the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy), another WHO related organization, declared that it was “unlikely” that the molecule could be carcinogenic to humans or that it could cause any type of risk to human health. The conflict between the two organizations of the World Health Organization triggered many doubts, and for this reason, a series of independent studies were launched to better understand what glyphosate’s danger to humans and the environment really was. The results have brought to light how massive use of the herbicide has created over time a real global contamination that has not only affected the soil, surface and groundwater as well as the atmosphere, but even food and commonly used objects, such as diapers, medical gauze, and absorbent for female intimate hygiene. How human health is compromised as a result of glyphosate exposure is a topic that is still very debatable and still unclear and unambiguous. This paper is a review of the results of the main independent recent scientific studies.

Highlights

  • This review paper deals with a topic that to date is not yet fully investigated, to enable certain conclusions to be drawn and be accepted by all authorities

  • The central theme of the present review study is the effects that the massive use of glyphosate has caused both to the ecosystems that come into contact with it and to human health

  • Several traces of herbicide have been found in various foods, especially those based on cereals, in everyday objects, in drinking water, and even in human urine through a series of studies conducted in recent years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This review paper deals with a topic that to date is not yet fully investigated, to enable certain conclusions to be drawn and be accepted by all authorities. The central theme of the present review study is the effects that the massive use of glyphosate has caused both to the ecosystems that come into contact with it and to human health. As human health is compromised due to glyphosate exposure, it remains a controversial subject and for this reason numerous research studies have been carried out, both by public and private organizations [9,10,11]. This paper addresses the need to find valid alternative technologies to the use of glyphosate. For this reason, the paper describes various agricultural methods that substitute the use of glyphosate, such as biological agriculture

Characteristics and Environmental Contamination
Human and Animals Health
Outcome of Research Studies
Diffusion Due to GMO Crops
Classification as Carcinogenic
Scientific Debate
Alternative Solutions to Glyphosate
Pyroherbicide
Biological Agriculture
Biodynamic Agriculture
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.