Abstract

More than 450 thermal contact resistance data points obtained from isotropic conforming rough surfaces for five different materials; Ni200, SS304, two Zirconium alloys and Al6061 have been compared with the existing elastic and plastic models. For the first time data have been reduced to a dimensionless form assuming both elastic as well as plastic deformation. Normally data were compared with either the elastic model or the plastic model assuming a type of deformation a priori. The relative merits of different models and the surface factors influencing the mode of deformation are still not clear. Hence the aim of the present work was to compare most of the models available in the literature with themselves as well as with isotropic data. Comparison showed that generally smoother surfaces deform elastically and rougher ones plastically. However there are some data sets which compare well with both the elastic as well as the plastic models. 20 refs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call