Abstract
Visual field defects without any organic correlate require critical control to avoid inadequate management of psychogenic defects. Which methods are promising to detect psychogenic visual field defects? Twenty ophthalmologically trained volunteers motivated to pretend a concentric visual field loss were tested by manual perimetry with centripetal and centrifugal movement of the stimulus, by evoking saccadic eye movements towards a stimulus outside the subjectively claimed visual field and by observation of the volunteers’ strategy searching a stimulus beyond the subjectively claimed borders. Malingering could be proven in 16 persons. The most favourable procedure is to evoke eye movements towards a peripheral stimulus. These movements yield information about the visual field outside the subjectively stated limits.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
