Critical assessment of the recent report on the gigaparsec-scale correlation of the orientations of large quasar groups

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recently, it was reported that large quasar groups (LQGs) identified from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data release seven catalogue are not randomly oriented but preferentially aligned or orthogonal over scales 1–2 Gpc. To confirm this claim, I reproduced the same LQG sample and performed Sobolev tests of uniformity on the LQG orientation axes in the redshift space. Contrary to the original report based on the bimodal distribution of the LQG position angles in the sky, I found no departure from uniformity in the distribution of the LQG orientation axes. I also examined whether the LQGs are physical structures using a statistically more reliable data set constructed from the SDSS data release 16 (DR16) large-scale structure (LSS) quasar catalogue. Considering the Gaussian primordial density fluctuations and shot noise, I estimated the mass density contrasts of the LQGs from the number counts of the DR16 LSS quasars and found that most of the LQGs do not trace statistically significant high-density regions. I conclude that the LQG sample is a collection of unphysical chance associations and should not be used for any cosmological studies.