Abstract
Role negotiation is a pivotal step in the role-based collaboration (RBC) process. There are many factors to be considered when decision makers set up criteria to evaluate group performance and agents’ abilities. In this paper, we investigate the applications of three traditional multicriteria decision making methods into role negotiation of RBC, i.e., simple additive weighting, multiplication exponent weighting, and weighted distance. The goal is to acquire ideal and satisfactory methods to set up the evaluation criteria for the role negotiation task. The main contributions of this paper include: 1) a method of generating the matrix of agent qualifications, with a discrete, usually, limited, and finite set of prespecified attributes and values; 2) the upper and lower thresholds of a role’s ability requirements, which are critical parameters for a workable team and its performance; and 3) the potential influences of specialist agents and generalist agents on the group performance. The proposed methods are verified by simulation experiments. The simulation results show that the proposed methods are reasonable, feasible, and practical.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
