Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper investigates anti-terrorism law’s impact on peace-making efforts of the nonviolent allies of Basque Homeland and Freedom (ETA) and the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA). Drawing on debates concerning ‘enemy criminal law’, I argue that anti-terrorism law is actor-focused and thus directed at juridically labelled ‘terrorist organisations’. Variation in the juridical construction of terrorist organisations is critical to understanding the divergence in the political capacities of non-violent Basque separatists and Irish republicans as peace-makers. In Spain, the judiciary developed a broad definition of the ‘terrorist organisation ETA’, resulting in the identification of non-violent Basque separatist groups as ‘integral components’ of ETA and hindering their capacity to engage in peace-making. In contrast, British anti-terrorism law was grounded in a narrow definition of ‘proscribed organisations’ focused on the IRA’s rank-and-file, which facilitated the involvement of the broader republican movement in the successful peace process of the nineties.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.