Abstract

The specific goal of this research is to know and analyze the provisions of norms or legal norms relating to the criminal liability of road organizers from the dogmatic aspects of the law and legal principles. Since there is a norm vacuum of Law Number 22 Year 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation, if the road organizer does not exercise its authority, it will result in a criminal offense then this law cannot be implemented or impaired. The statement of the problem in this research is how criminal liability of the Road Organizers and Road Transportation according to Law Number 22 Year 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation.
 This research is normative. The data were obtained by a detailed analysis of legal materials, primary, secondary and tertiary law. The specification of this research is the pure legal research to get a picture of one problem, namely about the criminal responsibility of the road organizer from the perspective of Law Number 22 Year 2009, concerning Traffic and Road Transportation. 
 Through the legislative approach (normative approach), which is the approach to the applicable laws and regulations to obtain a basis for discussing issues related to traffic and road transport crimes, including legislation Law Number 22 Year 2009, concerning Road Traffic and Transport Law Number 38 of 2004, Concerning Roads, Government Regulation Number 43 of 1993 concerning Road Infrastructure and Traffic. The results of the study indicate that there is a blurring of norms in Law Number 22 Year 2009, especially regarding the concept of road organizers as regulated in Article 24 and Article 273. as a result, the article cannot be operational. So that criminal liability for road organizers if they make a mistake on the formulas of article 24 and article 273 is difficult to account for. Although the organizer of the road as a legal subject if making a mistake should be responsible and can be held responsible based on the theory of strict liability and vicarious liability. The conclusion is that Law No. 22/2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transport does not regulate the concept of road organizers so that if a road organizer makes a mistake as regulated in Article 24 and Article 273 it is difficult to be accounted for, thus ensuring that there is a blurring of norms in The law and unworking.

Highlights

  • The existence of Law Number 22 Year 2009, concerning Traffic and RoadTransportation has a very strategic function and purpose in handling traffic problems, especially those related to the land transportation system

  • The existence of traffic regulations and road transport in addition to its function as social control and social engineering as mentioned above, it has a strategic function on a national scale as well as an international dimension, because the legal rules contained in the law is applicable and bonded on all people including foreigners who are inside the territory of the Republic of Indonesia

  • From the aspect of criminal liability, the road organizer is identical to the corporation, only the management system distinguishes it from the corporation in general

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The existence of Law Number 22 Year 2009, concerning Traffic and RoadTransportation has a very strategic function and purpose in handling traffic problems, especially those related to the land transportation system. The existence of Law Number 22 Year 2009, concerning Traffic and Road. Considering the nature of the traffic laws and road transport as mentioned above, there are two main functions of the existence of the traffic laws namely: 1. 2. A social engineering function aims to resolve when violations or conflicts occur so that what is the purpose of the law can be realized, realize the resolution of violations or conflicts that occur as a result of deviant acts or behavior by the norms and rules of law that are humane and justice. The existence of traffic regulations and road transport in addition to its function as social control and social engineering as mentioned above, it has a strategic function on a national scale as well as an international dimension, because the legal rules contained in the law is applicable and bonded on all people including foreigners who are inside the territory of the Republic of Indonesia

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call