Abstract
The influence of the memory of the on ideological and propaganda support of the second annexation of the Crimea in 2014. Analyzed the nature and impact of the concept of historical in the formation of modern Russian social and political discourse about the Crimea. Although historically (national) grievance - a legacy of the past, it is important to understand exactly what is the past in each case. There are ancient grievances arising from specific events, injustice on the part of other nations (war, annexing, genocide). This grievance has lost a clear outline of the influence of time, and may gradually come to naught. But under certain circumstances, these memories can be extracted from the depths of memory, and become relevant. Or even appears that the origins of this awakening the memory of grievances are not in the past and in the present. National grievance can play a negative role in times of economic, political and social crisis. Society often shifts the blame for their problems to people in other countries that are not related to the incident. This is also called a national grievance. But this is another phenomenon, which is called the national resentment.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.