Abstract
course were consistent within 5% and 1.5% of the planned mean doses for PTvs and CTvs, respectively. For the tighter margin plans, the cumulative mean dose ratios were consistent within 4.3% and 2.3% of the planned mean doses for CTV2 and CTV3, respectively. No significant changes in D95 and D90 for the CTV2/3 cumulative doses in both reference and tighter margin plans were observed. While interfraction anatomical changes introduced minor variations in delivered target doses, improved normal structure sparing was observed in plan_0margin. The averaged planned cord maximum doses in Plan_0margin was 7.6% lower, and the parotid mean doses were 18.9% lower than plan_Ref. Similar dose variations of the delivered dose were seen for the reference and tighter margin plans. The delivered maximum and mean doses for the cord were 20% and 10% higher than the planned doses; a 3.6% higher cumulative mean dose for the parotids was also observed for the delivered dose than the planned doses in both plans. Conclusions: The GPU-based image framework enables real-time dose verification, accumulation and documentation. By imposing tighter PTV margins for level 2 and 3 targets for HN Varian Medical Systems, Inc. F. Honoraria; Accuray Inc., Siemens Medical Solutions, Viewray Inc. M. Steinberg: None. D. Low: None. S. Lee: None.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.