Abstract

AbstractThe Saturnian system has been explored by four spacecraft: Pioneer 11, Voyager 1 and 2, and Cassini. Only the last three took images suitable for photogeologic analysis of the surfaces of Saturn's moons, and over the decades, several research groups have published data about the crater distributions on the Saturnian satellites. These groups have used those data to draw conclusions about the impactor populations and resurfacing histories of the moons, but no one has examined how well the different data agree between the researchers. We present independent mapping of the crater populations of Saturn's moons Mimas, Rhea, and Iapetus, and compare them with many published crater populations. We found that Mimas data are the most consistent between different researchers, and Rhea data are the least consistent. We attribute these differences to (a) data biases where there are fewer images upon which to map Mimantean craters but a large variety exist for Rhean, and (b) Rhea likely has different terrains with different impact crater populations which have not been generally recognized before. We also found that Iapetus' small craters appear to have a shallow branch, as others have found, and that shallow branch is not attributable to completeness limitations. Other bodies have shallow branches at small diameters, too, but they are not as shallow as Iapetus's, which suggests varying impacting populations as one moves closer to Saturn, in line with others' work on planetocentric impactors.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call