Abstract

<h3>Objectives</h3> To find pharmacological options in post-COVID 19 Sildenafil therapy failure in men with before-COVID 19 onset and treated ED, starting from the fact that published studies proves COVID 19 as a risk factor for ED, as well as for Sildenafil loss efficacy in before COVID 19 started ED treatment. <h3>Methods</h3> From prior to 2020 Sildenafil treated ED's we selected 78 ED cases, recently claiming Sildenafil lack efficacy after a COVID 19 episode. According to optional recommendations, 42 cases (gr. A) have chose Avanafil instead to continue the ED therapy, whereas 36 cases (gr. B) preferred intra-urethral Alprostadil. The ED domain of International Index of Erectile Function (ED-IIEF), the erectile hardness score (EHS) and the Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 (SEP2) and 3 (SEP3) were applied in 4 steps: V1=gr.A1/gr.B1 (first visit, presentation before COVID 19); V2=gr.A2/gr.B2 (second visit, before COVID 19 for Sildenafil benefit assessment); V3 gr.A3/grB3 (third visit, post-COVID 19, medical request for Sildenafil failure); V4=gr.A4/gr.B4 (forth visit, the assessment of the replacing Sildenafil new therapy). <h3>Results</h3> <i>ED-IIEF</i><b>:</b> gr.A1/gr.B1 = 17.32/18.07 (<i>P</i> = 0.22); gr.A2/gr.B2 = 25.33/24.54 (<i>P</i> = 0.15); gr.A3/grB3 = 14.67/14.22 (<i>P</i> = 0.1); gr.A4/gr.B4 = 20.78/26.33 (<i>P</i> = 0.065). <i>EHS:</i> gr.A1/gr.B1 = 1.12/1.7 (<i>P</i> = 0.35); gr.A2/gr.B2 = 3.33/3.54 (<i>P</i> = 0.15); gr.A3/grB3 = 1.67/1.22 (<i>P</i> = 0.5); gr.A4/gr.B4 = 2.4/3.67 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). <i>SEP 2:</i> gr.A1/gr.B1 = 2.2/1.7 (<i>P</i> = 0.3); gr.A2/gr.B2 = 4.53/4.54 (<i>P</i> = 0.9); gr.A3/grB3 = 1.67/1.33 (<i>P</i> = 0.2); gr.A4/gr.B4 = 3.12/4.33 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). <i>SEP 3:</i> gr.A1/gr.B1 = 1.8/2.3 (<i>P</i> = 0.35); gr.A2/gr.B2 = 4.33/4.87 (<i>P</i> = 0.75); gr.A3/grB3 = 1.45/1.54 (<i>P</i> = 0.15); gr.A4/gr.B4 = 3.22/4.66 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Sildenafil, as well as other PDE5I's, were already confirmed, as proper for treating ED. However, to correct COVID 19 induced Sildenafil failure, even Avanafil could represent another PDE5I option, the intra-urethral Alprostadil turned out to be a significantly better opportunity. <h3>Conflicts of Interest</h3> none

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.