Abstract

In China, “judicial management” mainly includes case management, case management, judiciary personnel management and judicial property management. As a basic concept, “judicial independence” means the courts exercising judicial power independently as a whole, instead of independence of a single judge or collegiate bench as to manage the cases. Such a system has been criticized as “bureaucratization of adjudication” in that the leaders or managers of the courts actually share the judges’ judicial power so as to damage both transparency and efficiency of judicial processes. A series of reforms aim to establish a new mechanism as so called “panel responsibility” or “trial accountability” system, which will adjust the relationship among the judges or penal as a case manager and their leaders as a judge manager under the principle “Let the trier/ inquisitor to decide, and let the decider to be responsible”.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.