Abstract
This study deals with the counterclaim issue as a means of proof. This subject is particularly important because it exempts the opponent from resorting to other means of proof. Without a legislative text, identifying cases of counterclaims and the Judge's power over them has become necessary. This research concludes with a series of conclusions and recommendations, most notably that the civil Judge's power to assess the counterclaim of a judicial statement is limited in the light of the conditions required by the legislator, while the Judge has broad discretion towards non-judicial recognition. We hope that the Jordanian legislature will explicitly stipulate the effect of counterclaim in any dispute.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
