Could Ultimate Reality Be Indeterminate? Inverting the Demands of Robert Neville’s Argument

Abstract

Research Article| May 01 2018 Could Ultimate Reality Be Indeterminate? Inverting the Demands of Robert Neville’s Argument Rory Misiewicz Rory Misiewicz Princeton Theological Seminary Rory Misiewicz is a PhD candidate in theology at Princeton Theological Seminary. His broad areas of interest include theological method, philosophical theology, and the pragmatic tradition (especially C. S. Peirce). His dissertation centers on the problem of theological analogy and aims to introduce a Peircean alternative in ecumenical debates on the analogia entis. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google American Journal of Theology & Philosophy (2018) 39 (2): 4–18. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjtheophil.39.2.0004 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Rory Misiewicz; Could Ultimate Reality Be Indeterminate? Inverting the Demands of Robert Neville’s Argument. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 1 May 2018; 39 (2): 4–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjtheophil.39.2.0004 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveUniversity of Illinois PressAmerican Journal of Theology & Philosophy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright 2018 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois2018 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.