Abstract
Obesity is the most common risk factor for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Weight loss can be an effective treatment for obesity and may slow the progression of advanced liver disease. To assess the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery in patients with NASH and compensated cirrhosis. This economic evaluation study used a Markov-based state-transition model to simulate the benefits and risks of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GB), and intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) compared with usual care in patients with NASH and compensated cirrhosis and varying baseline weight (overweight, mild obesity, moderate obesity, and severe obesity). Patients faced varied risks of perioperative mortality and complications depending on the type of surgery they underwent. Data were collected on March 22, 2017. Life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs (in 2017 $US), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Demographic characteristics of the patient population were based on a previously published prospective study (n = 161). Patients in the model were 41.0% female, and the base case age was 54 years. Compared with usual care, SG was associated with an increase in QALYs of 0.263 to 1.180 (bounds of ranges represent overweight to severe obesity); GB, 0.263 to 1.207; and ILI, 0.004 to 0.216. Sleeve gastrectomy was also associated with an increase in life-years of 0.693 to 1.930; GB, 0.694 to 1.947; and ILI, 0.012 to 0.114. With usual care, expected life-years in overweight, mild obesity, moderate obesity, and severe obesity were 12.939, 11.949, 10.976, and 10.095, respectively. With usual care, QALY in overweight was 6.418; mild obesity, 5.790; moderate obesity, 5.186; and severe obesity, 4.577. Sleeve gastrectomy was the most cost-effective option for patients across all weight classes assessed: ICER for SG in patients with overweight was $66 119 per QALY; mild obesity, $18 716 per QALY; moderate obesity, $10 274 per QALY; and severe obesity, $6563 per QALY. A threshold analysis on the procedure cost of GB found that for GB to be cost-effective, the cost of the surgery must be decreased from its baseline value of $28 734 by $4889 for mild obesity, by $3189 for moderate obesity, and by $2289 for severe obesity. In overweight patients, GB involved fewer QALYs than SG, and thus decreasing the cost of surgery would not result in cost-effectiveness. Bariatric surgery could be highly cost-effective in patients with NASH compensated cirrhosis and obesity or overweight. The findings from this analysis suggest that it can inform clinical trials evaluating the effect of bariatric procedures in patients with NASH cirrhosis, including those with a lower body mass index.
Highlights
The prevalence of adult obesity in the United States is expected to reach approximately 50% by 2030.1 Obesity is the most common risk factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the progressive subtype of the disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which can give rise to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was associated with an increase in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 0.263 to 1.180; gastric bypass (GB), 0.263 to 1.207; and intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI), 0.004 to 0.216
For overweight patients, GB had the largest increase in life-years; SG had the largest increase in QALYs, followed very closely by GB and by ILI
Summary
The prevalence of adult obesity in the United States is expected to reach approximately 50% by 2030.1 Obesity is the most common risk factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the progressive subtype of the disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which can give rise to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). More than 70% of patients with compensated cirrhosis were overweight or obese.[2] In addition to contributing to the development of advanced liver disease, obesity leads to worse outcomes among patients with compensated cirrhosis. Compared with their normal-weight counterparts, obese patients with compensated cirrhosis face a nearly 3-fold increased risk of decompensation.[2]. Costs were evaluated from the perspective of a third-party payer
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have