Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the potential savings to health plans when the Pigmented Lesion Assay(PLA) is incorporated into the assessment of pigmented lesions clinically suspicious formelanoma.Methods: A Return on Investment (ROI) model was developed from a US payor perspective todetermine the per member per month (PMPM) net savings impact of incorporating PLA into thevisual assessment/histopathology (VAH) pathway. Using 2019 claims data for patients withlesions suspicious for melanoma (N=239,854), use of PLA in year 1 was modeled and followedthrough subsequent years. Costs were assessed through the pathway of initial visual assessment,surgical procedure(s), histopathology, and subsequent management.Results: The ROI model predicted annual net savings of $0.54 PMPM for commercial healthplans over a three-year period. In this analysis, 95.7% of surgically assessed lesions clinicallysuspicious for melanoma were diagnosed as benign, with 30.4% of patients with benign lesionsundergoing a more advanced procedure (e.g., excision). Melanoma diagnosis rates associatedwith biopsy only, excision only, and biopsy followed by excision procedures in the VAHpathway were 0.7%, 1.1%, and 18.0%, respectively.Conclusion: Incorporation of the PLA into the VAH pathway for assessingsuspicious pigmented lesions results in savings for commercial health insurance plans. Use of thePLA improves patient care by using genomic assessments to minimize avoidable surgicalprocedures on benign lesions, enrich the population of melanomas diagnosed, and decreasedownstream costs of late-stage melanoma diagnoses.

Highlights

  • The current care pathway for evaluation of pigmented lesions is visual assessment, followed by surgical biopsy and histopathologic assessment (VAH).[1]

  • The Return on Investment (ROI) model was developed from a health plan perspective and designed to assess the per member per month (PMPM) net cost/savings impact of incorporating Pigmented Lesion Assay (PLA) into the visual assessment/histopathology (VAH) pathway

  • The model was built from claims data, financial factor inputs, costs associated with the VAH pathway, PLA investment costs, assumptions related to lesion progression in non-detected melanomas, and the number of target members for PLA in a plan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current care pathway for evaluation of pigmented lesions is visual assessment, followed by surgical biopsy and histopathologic assessment (VAH).[1]. The significant overlap in clinical and histopathologic features that exists between benign and malignant nevi make the classification of pigmented lesions a challenge for even highly experienced clinicians and pathologists.[2, 3]. The VAH pathway relies on image and pattern recognition/interpretation, which is subjective in nature.[1, 3, 4]. This, paired with concern regarding potential consequences of missing a melanoma, has resulted in a VAH pathway with a relatively low sensitivity Melanomas) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%.3, 5-7. These findings demonstrate the need for objective, costeffective technologies to help improve the assessment, classification, and management of pigmented lesions Melanomas) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%.3, 5-7 These findings demonstrate the need for objective, costeffective technologies to help improve the assessment, classification, and management of pigmented lesions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call