Corrigendum

Abstract

Functional EcologyVolume 33, Issue 9 p. 1811-1812 CORRIGENDUMFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: More than iso/anisohydry: Hydroscapes integrate plant water use and drought tolerance traits in 10 eucalypt species from contrasting climates Ximeng Li, Chris J. Blackman, Jennifer M. R. Peters, Brendan Choat, Paul D. Rymer, Belinda E. Medlyn, David T. Tissue, Rafael Oliveira, Volume 33Issue 6Functional Ecology pages: 1035-1049 First Published online: April 7, 2019 First published: 22 July 2019 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13412AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Li, X, Blackman, C. J., Peters, J. M. R., Choat, B., Rymer, P. D., Medlyn, B. E., Tissue, D. T. (2019). More than iso/anisohydry: Hydroscapes integrate plant water use and drought tolerance traits in 10 eucalypt species from contrasting climates. Functional Ecology, 2019; 33: 1035–1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13320 In the paper by Li et al. (2019), Figures 3 and 4 were reversed. The figures are reproduced correctly below. Figure 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Bi-plot showing the results of principal component analysis (PCA) among metrics of isohydricity and plant traits. Traits used for PCA are turgor loss point (TLP), stomatal closure point (Pgs90), xylem water potential inducing 50% loss of conductivity in stem (Px50) and leaf (PL50), maximum stomatal conductance (gsmax), maximum stem conductivity (Kmax) and Huber value (HV). Different vegetation types are abbreviated using initials and are coloured differently (DSF, dry sclerophyll forest; GW, grassy woodland; SAW, semi-arid woodland; WSF, wet sclerophyll forest Figure 4Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Percentage loss of xylem conductivity of leaf (solid line, light grey band), stem (open triangle, light blue band) and relative stomatal conductance (closed circle, pink band) responds to water potential in two species (Figure 2a,b) with contrasting Hydroscape area (Figure 2c,d). Shaded bands represent confidence interval for stem and stomatal response to water potential and denote standard error for leaf response. Inset images show the propagation of embolism within leaf vein network during dehydration. Veins are coloured differently according to the water potential at which embolism occurs. Numbers below the scale bar indicate the water potential at which first and last embolism events were observed. Colours of data points in panel c and panel d represent different individuals. R2 of linear regression is also shown. Asterisk indicates significant level (***p < .001; **p < .01; *p < .05) The authors apologize for any confusion. Reference Li, X., Blackman, C. J., Peters, J. M. R., Choat, B., Rymer, P. D., Medlyn, B. E., & Tissue, D. T. (2019). More than iso/anisohydry: Hydroscapes integrate plant water use and drought tolerance traits in 10 eucalypt species from contrasting climates. Functional Ecology, 33, 1035– 1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13320 Volume33, Issue9September 2019Pages 1811-1812 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation