CORRIGENDUM.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

CorrigendumCORRIGENDUMPublished Online:13 Jun 2019https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.z9k-5111-corr.2019Original articleMoreSectionsPDF (52 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInWeChat Shadmehr R. Distinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still. J Neurophysiol 117: 1431–1460, 2017. First published January 4, 2017; doi:10.1152/jn.00840.2016.The author issues a correction to his review article “Distinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still.” This correction does not affect any conclusions of the article and has arisen because the author was made aware of an important publication (Cheron et al. 1986) that was not cited in the review.On page 1435, first column, it should read “Cheron et al. (1986), and subsequently Cannon and Robinson (1987), discovered one such circuit in the dorsal rostral medulla, a region where neurons project onto the abducens nucleus.”On page 1442, second column, it should read “Kaneko (1997) had confirmed Cheron et al. (1986) and Cannon and Robinson’s (1987) finding that damage to the prepositus impaired the animal’s ability to hold the eyes steady following the saccade.”REFERENCE Cheron G, Godaux E, Laune JM, Vanderkelen B. Lesions in the cat prepositus complex: effects on the vestibulo-ocular reflex and saccades. J Physiol 372: 75–94, 1986. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015998. Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar Download PDF Previous Back to Top FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation Related ArticlesDistinct neural circuits for control of movement vs. holding still 01 Apr 2017Journal of Neurophysiology More from this issue > Volume 121Issue 6June 2019Pages 2433-2433 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2019 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/jn.z9k-5111-corr.2019PubMed31194623History Published online 13 June 2019 Published in print 1 June 2019 Metrics