Abstract
The incorrect syntaxon names were mentioned in the original article (Krestov et al. 2023). The association "Athyrio–Pinetum koraiensis (validated in this paper)" was indicated as a typical element for the alliance Tilio amurensis– Pinion koraiensis. However, this association was described under a different name: Diplazio sibirici–Pinetum koraiensis Kim ex Krestov, Dzizyurova et Korznikov 2023. Here, we validate the alliance Tilio amurensis–Pinion koraiensis all. nov., holotypus hoc loco – Diplazio sibirici–Pinetum koraiensis Kim ex Krestov, Dzizyurova et Korznikov 2023 (Krestov et al. 2023), the full diagnosis is on page 121 in Krestov et al. (2006). We also validate the order Tilio amurensis–Pinetalia koraiensis ord. nov., holotypus hoc loco – Tilio amurensis–Pinion koraiensis (validated above); the full diagnosis is on pages 117–118 in Krestov et al. (2006). We apologise for any confusion caused.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.