Correlative analysis of embedded silicon interface passivation by Kelvin probe force microscopy and corona oxide characterization of semiconductor.

Valentin Aubriet,Mickael Gros-Jean,Kristell Courouble,Łukasz Borowik

doi:10.1063/5.0052885

Abstract

We report a correlative analysis between corona oxide characterization of semiconductor (COCOS) and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) in a study of embedded silicon surfaces in the field of chemical and field-effect passivation. The COCOS approach gives access to the defect density, the total charge contained in the passivation stack, and the potential barrier. Based on the COCOS parameters, we could probe by KPFM to analyze the influence of the passivation stack upon the surface photovoltage. Thus, KPFM emerges as a valuable method to access chemical and field-effect passivation directly. We confirm that it is possible to differentiate by KPFM the influence of local band bending (i.e., field-effect passivation) from the effects due to the local recombination rates (i.e., chemical passivation). The measurements were carried on five different passivation layers of different thicknesses, precisely, 10.5nm SiO2, 50nm SiN, 7nm Al2O3, 7nm HfO2, and a double layer of 7nm Al2O3 below 53nm Ta2O5. Based on our correlative analysis, we could identify by KPFM that HfO2 displays the best chemical passivation properties. Additionally, we confirm that using an anti-reflective coating such as a Ta2O5 layer on top of Al2O3 causes the chemical passivation to deteriorate. Finally, for p-type silicon, SiN appears to be the worst case in terms of field-effect passivation.

Highlights

Characterization of interfaces is essential for several types of devices like solar cells, photodetectors or LED devices
In this work, we use non-contact atomic force microscopy (VT-AFM from ScientaOmicron interfaced with a Nanonis controller from SPECS Zürich) operating under ultrahigh vacuum conditions (
In h-Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) a bias voltage Vac is applied at f1-f0 (f0 and f1 being the fundamental resonant frequency and its first harmonic respectively) which generate an electrostatic force at f1 if the cantilever Vdc bias does not match the contact potential difference (CPD)

Summary

Introduction

Characterization of interfaces is essential for several types of devices like solar cells, photodetectors or LED devices. Such extracted SPV from KPFM measurements will be compared to total fixed charge (Qtot), density of defects (DiT) and barrier potential (VSB) all probed by COCOS.

Results

Conclusion