Abstract

Background/purposeResonance frequency analysis (RFA) is clinically used in dentistry to access the stiffness of dental implants in surrounding bone. However, the clear advantages and disadvantages of this method are still inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare implant stability quotient (ISQ) values obtained from RFA with parameters obtained from a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of the same region.Materials and methodsNineteen implants (Conelog) were inserted in the posterior maxillary and mandibular partially edentulous regions of 16 patients. At the time of implant placement, the ISQ values were obtained using RFA (Osstell). CBCT was used to measure the thickness of the crestal, cortical, buccolingual cortical, and cancellous bone at 3, 6, and 9 mm below the crestal bone level, as indicated by radiographic markers. The ratio of the thickness of the cortical to cancellous bone at varying depths was also calculated and classified into 4 groups (Group 1–4).ResultsThere was a strong correlation between the crestal cortical bone thickness and ISQ values (P<0.001). The thickness of the buccolingual cortical bone and ratio of the cortical to cancellous bone thickness at 3 mm were significantly related to the ISQ (P = 0.018 and P = 0.034, respectively). Furthermore, the ISQs in Group 1 were the highest compared with those in Group 2 and Group 3, whereas the CBCT parameters at 6 and 9 mm did not have any specific correlation with the ISQ values.ConclusionThis study showed that the ISQ values obtained from RFA highly correlated with the quantity and quality of bone 3 mm below the crestal bone level. The correlation between the ISQ and bone surrounding the implant site was dependent on the depth of measurement. Therefore, RFA can help to predict the marginal bone level, as confirmed in this study.

Highlights

  • Dental implants are recognized as a reliable treatment option for replacing missing teeth [1]

  • There was a strong correlation between the crestal cortical bone thickness and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values (P

  • The thickness of the buccolingual cortical bone and ratio of the cortical to cancellous bone thickness at 3 mm were significantly related to the ISQ (P = 0.018 and P = 0.034, respectively)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dental implants are recognized as a reliable treatment option for replacing missing teeth [1]. Primary implant stability is a key factor that influences the survival rate of these implants [2,3,4] It is defined as an assessment of clinical movement between the bone and implant following its placement [5, 6]. Several studies have revealed a correlation between L&Z classification and primary implant stability [11, 12] This grading is subjective in nature, as it based on radiographic assessments and the surgeon’s tactile sensation during osteotomy procedures. This classification can only be applied with mild or moderate accuracy [10, 13, 14]

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call