Abstract
Purpose: Endovascular treatment (EVT) of intracranial aneurysms (IA) requires a continuous anticoagulation to avoid thromboembolic complications. In order to monitor the anticoagulation, different tests may be used including the activated clotting time (ACT) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The aim of this study was to compare ACT and APTT for the monitoring of the anticoagulation during EVT of IA. Methods: Patients referred for EVT of an IA were included. After induction, baseline ACT and APTT were recorded, followed by a bolus infusion of unfractionated heparin (50 UI.kg–1). The same tests were controlled five minutes later with the purpose of doubling the baseline ACT value. Correlation and agreement between both tests were evaluated for the percentage of change after the bolus. Multiple linear regressions were also calculated in order to show confounding factors. Complications and outcomes were also recorded. Results: 45 patients were checked for enrolment and 24 were included for analysis. Mean (SD) % variation for APTT was 432.1 (75.7) and 60.6 (23.0) for ACT with p < 0.0001. With the Bland-Altman method, value of Bias (SD) is 372 (86) with 95% limits of agreement range from 203 to 540. Pearson correlation for % variation shows r (95% CI) = –0.23 (–0.58 to 0.19) with p = 0.29 and R square = 0.05. 100% of the APTT values could be defined as excessive anticoagulation by opposition of the 8% obtained with ACT. Conclusions: This prospective observational study shows that ACT test is not well correlated with APTT and leads to a systematic excessive coagulation during EVT of IA.
Highlights
Treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IA) has significantly evolved during the last decade [1]
Pearson correlation for % variation shows r = –0.23 (–0.58 to 0.19) with p = 0.29 and R square = 0.05. 100% of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) values could be defined as excessive anticoagulation by opposition of the 8% obtained with activated clotting time (ACT)
According to the results obtained after the first bolus, 100% of the APTT values could be defined as excessive anticoagulation by opposition of the 8% obtained with ACT
Summary
Treatment of IA has significantly evolved during the last decade [1]. EVT is the first intention treatment of IA in most cases. The endovascular approach requires a precise and continuous anticoagulation in order to avoid thromboembolic complications [2]. No definitive guidelines have been formulated concerning the optimal anticoagulation regimen during these procedures [3]. Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) is generally used because of the possible titration and because it can be reversed with the administration of protamine sulphate. In order to monitor the anticoagulation during EVT, different tests may be used including the activated clotting time (ACT) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have