Correction.

Abstract

Previous article FreeCorrectionBenjamin G. Freeman, Micah N. Scholer, Mannfred M. A. Boehm, Julian Heavyside, and Dolph SchluterBenjamin G. Freeman1. Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada2. Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada Search for more articles by this author , Micah N. Scholer1. Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada2. Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada Search for more articles by this author , Mannfred M. A. Boehm1. Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada3. Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada Search for more articles by this author , Julian Heavyside1. Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada2. Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada Search for more articles by this author , and Dolph Schluter1. Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada2. Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada Search for more articles by this author Original articleAdaptation and Latitudinal Gradients in Species Interactions: Nest Predation in BirdsFull TextPDF Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreWe would like to make a correction to our article “Adaptation and Latitudinal Gradients in Species Interactions: Nest Predation in Birds” (American Naturalist 196:E160–E166; https://doi.org/10.1086/711415). One result of our paper is that daily rates of nest predation in our data set were higher at low elevations than at high elevations. At the end of the results section, in the subsection titled “Elevation and Nest Shape Drive Predation,” the text should read “Daily rates of nest predation were … higher at sea level than at 2,000 m (4.6% vs. 3.2%; table S2).” The original text erroneously read “Daily rates of nest predation were … higher at 2,000 m compared with sea level (4.6% vs. 3.2%; table S2).” Our treatment of this topic in the discussion section remains correct. We thank Morgan Tingley for pointing out this error. Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 197, Number 5May 2021 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/713711 Views: 543 HistorySubmitted January 23, 2021Published online March 18, 2021 © 2021 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Crossref reports no articles citing this article.Related articlesAdaptation and Latitudinal Gradients in Species Interactions: Nest Predation in Birds20 Oct 2020The American Naturalist