Abstract
The Journal of Theological Studies, 2021, ns, 72, pp. 479–82, https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flab056 In the version of this review originally published, there was an error in the reporting of the figures given in The Theology and Ecclesiology of the Prayer Book Crisis, 1906–1928, by Dan D. Cruickshank, for the initial and final votes in favour of the revised prayer book in the Church Assembly in February and April 1928. The figure of 80% belongs to the February vote, not to the April vote as the author of the review mistakenly understood. Cruickshank’s figures for the April vote are thus in line with those of Jasper and Cuming. A detailed breakdown of the votes is found in the endnotes (notes 192 and 207 on pp. 113 and 114).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
