Abstract

While several studies have studied the unique features of Bahamian Creole, there have been to date no academic studies analysing Standard Bahamian English, the language of formal communication in the Bahamas. This study fills this gap in the literature. Using the methods of corpus linguistics, the study presents some of the unique features of Standard Bahamian English in comparison to other international variants of English, specifically British, American, and Jamaican English. For methodological purposes the texts analysed are limited to the genre of newspaper reportage. Features analysed include keywords and word counts.

Highlights

  • Studies of Bahamian English have, up to now, focused almost exclusively on the spoken creole rather than the written or prestige/acrolectal forms of usage

  • Studies have largely attempted either to tease out the distinct features of spoken Bahamian Creole (BC) (Hackert, 2004; Donnelly, 1997) or to present the unique issues faced by speakers of BC as they learn to compose in Standard English (Bain, 2005)

  • What’s more, if The Bahamas ever becomes keen on standardizing its own national variety of English, it appears likely that more creolized usages could never become the core of a codified national variant, as basilectal forms remain stigmatized among many educated speakers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studies of Bahamian English have, up to now, focused almost exclusively on the spoken creole rather than the written or prestige/acrolectal forms of usage. Studies have largely attempted either to tease out the distinct features of spoken Bahamian Creole (BC) (Hackert, 2004; Donnelly, 1997) or to present the unique issues faced by speakers of BC as they learn to compose in Standard English (Bain, 2005). In several of these studies, the goal has been to understand the place of BC in the Caribbean creoles and/or to support pan-linguistic theories of creole development (this is especially the case in the work of Holm, 1989). What’s more, if The Bahamas ever becomes keen on standardizing its own national variety of English, it appears likely that more creolized usages could never become the core of a codified national variant, as basilectal forms remain stigmatized among many educated speakers

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.