Abstract
The aim of this paper is to illuminate the role of the socio-economic, cultural and religious context in shaping corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices of banks in Bangladesh. The authors utilize content analysis of annual reports and websites of banks to identify CSR activities in healthcare, education and financial inclusion sectors. Structuration theory (ST) is used to explain how interactions between bank managers (as agents) with the social structures (institutions and government) shape CSR practices. The findings show that banks’ engagement in CSR activities is embedded in the social fabric of Bangladesh and not a result of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). It is also noted that Islamic banks focus their CSR activities on social justice, while other banks target education and other humanitarian issues. The authors contribute to the literature on the determinants of CSR by revealing the rationalizations of different actors in the production and reproduction of CSR practices in Bangladesh, an insight attributed to ST. The researchers conclude that Islamic beliefs influenced managers to mitigate poverty through CSR investments.
Highlights
There has been an increase in studies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in different national contexts (Aerts et al, 2006)
We conclude that the CSR framework in Bangladesh has evolved, as agents continuously and recursively sharpened their political, social, practical and ethical consciousness (Barley & Tolbert, 1997)
Drawing from the experiences of least developed countries (LDCs), it is evident that CSR practices are not universal, but culturally dependent
Summary
There has been an increase in studies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) in different national contexts (Aerts et al, 2006). International organizations, such as the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), commissioned the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI, 2002) to share best practices. The focus of GRI guidelines is to assist corporations to achieve triple bottom line (TBL) by reporting on economic, environmental and social issues, yet many least developed countries (LDCs) face complex social problems due to debilitating poverty. Belal and Cooper (2011) state that both governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have failed to address social justice issues such as poverty alleviation and human rights. Momin (2013) suggests that both the market and the government have failed to provide basic community services compelling NGOs and other corporations to play a significant role in societal development
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.