Abstract
There are enough provisions in the Lithuanian legislation prohibiting the imposition of corporal punishment, however, legal restrictions are ineffective – Lithuania is identified as the country in which parents often impose corporal punishment on their children. Although the harm of corporal punishment has been established, however, the debate that parents must be able to use corporal punishment as a dissuasive measure has been continuing up till now. Certain countries have placed a legal ban on the use of corporal punishment, and that has contributed to the change of the attitude of society towards the child. The article attempts to find still new arguments that the ban of corporal punishment towards children would be forbidden by law in Lithuania.
 The goal of the study is to elicit views on the use of corporal punishment towards children, reveal the links of this view with the level of happiness and the experience of corporal punishment in childhood. The method of the study is a questionnaire survey at the respondent’s home. 1002 people that are older than 18 from 19 towns and 31 villages participated in the study.
 The study has established that the persons who underwent corporal punishment in childhood more often support the view that “moderate corporal punishment is a proper parenting tool” than those who did not undergo corporal punishment in childhood. It has come to light that the opinion of the Lithuanian society on the use of corporal punishment towards children is changing – the investigates, who belonged to the younger age groups assessed corporal punishment more negatively than the older investigates. The respondents with higher levels of education supported corporal punishment of children more rarely than the respondents with lower levels of education. It has been established that that those who underwent corporal punishment in their childhood feel less happy that those who did not undergo corporal punishment.
Highlights
enough provisions in the Lithuanian legislation prohibiting the imposition of corporal punishment
legal restrictions are ineffective – Lithuania is identified as the country in which parents often impose corporal punishment
Certain countries have placed a legal ban on the use of corporal punishment
Summary
Nors fizinių bausmių žala nustatyta, tačiau diskusija apie tai, kad tėvai turi turėti galimybę taikyti fizines bausmes kaip vaiką drausminančią priemonę, tęsiasi iki šiol. Jungtinių Tautų ekspertų nuomone, fizinių bausmių taikymas vaikams negali būti pateisinamas ugdomaisiais tikslais, todėl jų uždraudimas tiesiogiai susijęs ne tik su JT vaiko teisių konvencijos 19 straipsnio, kuriame teigiama, kad valstybės, siekdamos apginti vaiką nuo įvairiausio pobūdžio fizinio ar psichologinio smurto, imasi visų reikiamų teisinių, administracinių, socialinių ir švietimo priemonių įgyvendinimo ir siekia keisti ugdomąsias nuostatas. 3. Nustatyti fizines bausmes vaikystėje patyrusių / nepatyrusių požiūrį į fizinių bausmių kaip vaikų ugdymo priemonės priimtinumą / nepriimtinumą. Tyrėjų kontrolė, siekiant išsiaiškinti, ar apklausa buvo vykdoma laikantis metodinių reikalavimų, ar nebuvo pažeistas atrankos principas, ar nebuvo pažeista nurodyta apklausos procedūra; duomenų įvedimo kontrolė – tikrinama mažiausiai 10 proc. Tyrimo kokybės kontrolė: vidinis tyrimo atlikimo patikrinimas – 100 proc. kontrolė (interviu skaičius, anketos užpildymo pilnumas, apklausos nuoseklumas); išorinis tyrimo atlikimo patikrinimas – mažiausiai 10 proc. tyrėjų kontrolė, siekiant išsiaiškinti, ar apklausa buvo vykdoma laikantis metodinių reikalavimų, ar nebuvo pažeistas atrankos principas, ar nebuvo pažeista nurodyta apklausos procedūra; duomenų įvedimo kontrolė – tikrinama mažiausiai 10 proc. įvesto duomenų masyvo
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
