Coronary artery disease in cardiac amyloidosis

Abstract

Abstract Background Cardiac amyloidosis is an important disease causing significant morbidity and mortality. Due to the ageing society as well as better diagnostic tools such as 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid scintigraphy (DPD scan), cardiac amyloidosis has increased in prevalence, however, the coexistence, as well as the differences in presentation with coronary artery disease (CAD), has not yet been discovered. Purpose The purpose of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of CAD in patients with cardiac amyloidosis, to assess differences in late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac MRI, and to assess differences in symptoms such as dyspnea. Materials and Methods We retrospectively assessed all patients with cardiac amyloidosis at our center and screened for an evaluation of coronary artery disease with coronary angiography, coronary CT, or myocardial scintigraphy. In all patients, who underwent cardiac MRI we assessed the pattern of LGE using the cardiac left ventricular segmentation model published by the AHA [1]. Results 295 patients (27% female, 74 ± 11 years) with cardiac amyloidosis (26% AL-amyloidosis, 74% ATTR-amyloidosis) were retrospectively assessed. Of those, 205 (69%) had a CAD evaluation. In 69 patients (34%), significant CAD was present, 10 patients (5%) had undergone CABG and 48 patients (23%) had received a PCI in the past. In patients with CAD, 3 patients (4%) suffered from NYHA IV and 51 patients (74%) were symptomatic with NYHA II or NYHA III. There were no significant differences to patients without CAD (p=0.252). In 153 patients (75%), cardiac MRI was performed. In 7% of the patients, no LGE was obvious, in 84%, a diffuse circular subendocardial to transmural LGE with basoapical gradient, typical for cardiac amyloidosis, could be observed. In 6% of the cases, a subendocardial pattern typical for post-ischemic changes could be observed; in 56% of the patients, a previous myocardial infarction was known. In the remaining 3%, LGE in the insertion points could be observed. Conclusion With 34%, CAD is highly prevalent in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. In 28%, a coronary intervention (surgical or interventional) was performed, making coronary interventions in patients with cardiac amyloidosis a feasible option. Cardiac MRI in patients with concomitant CAD and cardiac amyloidosis often shows the typical diffuse LGE, therefore, visualization of postischemic changes in these patients is difficult. Furthermore, symptoms do not differ between patients with CAD and no CAD.