Abstract

HomeJournal of the American Heart AssociationVol. 1, No. 2Updates in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Review Open AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toOpen AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBUpdates in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Review Sanjay M. Banypersad, MRCP, James C. Moon, MD, MRCP, Carol Whelan, MD, MRCP, Philip N. Hawkins, PhD, FMedSci and Ashutosh D. Wechalekar, DM, MRCP, FRCPath Sanjay M. BanypersadSanjay M. Banypersad From the National Amyloidosis Centre, UCL Medical School, UK The Heart Hospital, UK University College London, UK Search for more papers by this author , James C. MoonJames C. Moon The Heart Hospital, UK Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College of London, UK Search for more papers by this author , Carol WhelanCarol Whelan From the National Amyloidosis Centre, UCL Medical School, UK University College London, UK Search for more papers by this author , Philip N. HawkinsPhilip N. Hawkins From the National Amyloidosis Centre, UCL Medical School, UK Centre for Amyloidosis and Acute Phase Proteins, Division of Medicine, University College of London, UK Search for more papers by this author and Ashutosh D. WechalekarAshutosh D. Wechalekar From the National Amyloidosis Centre, UCL Medical School, UK Centre for Amyloidosis and Acute Phase Proteins, Division of Medicine, University College of London, UK Search for more papers by this author Originally published23 Apr 2012https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.111.000364Journal of the American Heart Association. 2012;1:e000364IntroductionSystemic amyloidosis is a relatively rare multisystem disease caused by the deposition of misfolded protein in various tissues and organs. It may present to almost any specialty, and diagnosis is frequently delayed.1 Cardiac involvement is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in primary light chain (AL) amyloidosis and in both wild‐type and hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. The heart is also occasionally involved in acquired serum amyloid A type (AA) amyloidosis and other rare hereditary types. Clinical phenotype varies greatly between different types of amyloidosis, and even the cardiac presentation has a great spectrum. The incidence of amyloidosis is uncertain, but it is thought that the most frequently diagnosed AL amyloidosis has an annual incidence of 6 to 10 cases per million population in the United Kingdom and United States. Amyloidosis due to transthyretin deposition (ATTR) can be wild‐type transthyretin amyloid deposits, which predominantly accumulate in the heart and are very common at autopsy in the elderly. Although the associated clinical syndrome known as senile systemic amyloidosis is diagnosed rarely in life,2 there is increasing evidence that this disorder is much underdiagnosed and that with increasing longevity and improved diagnostic methods it may be identified as a substantial public health problem.This review focuses on recent progress in the field: novel diagnostic and surveillance approaches using imaging (echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance), biomarkers (brain natriuretic peptide [BNP], high‐sensitivity troponin), new histological typing techniques, and current and future treatments, including approaches directly targeting the amyloid deposits.3PathophysiologyAmyloidosis is caused by the extracellular deposition of autologous protein in an abnormal insoluble β‐pleated sheet fibrillary conformation—that is, as amyloid fibrils. More than 30 proteins are known to be able to form amyloid fibrils in vivo, which cause disease by progressively damaging the structure and function of affected tissues.4 Amyloid deposits also contain minor nonfibrillary constituents, including serum amyloid P component (SAP), apolipoprotein E, connective tissue components (glycosaminoglycans, collagen), and basement membrane components (fibronectin, laminin).3, 5, 6, 7, 8 Amyloid deposits can be massive, and cardiac or other tissues may become substantially replaced. Amyloid fibrils bind Congo red stain, yielding the pathognomonic apple‐green birefringence under cross‐polarized light microscopy that remains the gold standard for identifying amyloid deposits.Clinical FeaturesCardiac amyloidosis, irrespective of type, presents as a restrictive cardiomyopathy characterized by progressive diastolic and subsequently systolic biventricular dysfunction and arrhythmia.1 Key “red flags” to possible systemic amyloidosis include nephrotic syndrome, autonomic neuropathy (eg, postural hypotension, diarrhea), soft‐tissue infiltrations (eg, macroglossia, carpal tunnel syndrome, respiratory disease), bleeding (eg, cutaneous, such as periorbital, gastrointestinal), malnutrition/cachexia and genetic predisposition (eg, family history, ethnicity). Initial presentations may be cardiac, with progressive exercise intolerance and heart failure. Other organ involvement, particularly in AL amyloidosis, may cloud the cardiac presentation (eg, nephrotic syndrome, autonomic neuropathy, pulmonary or bronchial involvement). Pulmonary edema is not common early in the disease process,9 but pleural and pericardial effusions and atrial arrhythmias are often seen.10, 11 Syncope is common and a poor prognostic sign.12 It is typically exertional or postprandial as part of restrictive cardiomyopathy, sensitivity to intravascular fluid depletion from loop diuretics combined with autonomic neuropathy, or conduction tissue involvement (atrioventricular or sinoatrial nodes) or ventricular arrhythmia.13, 14, 15 The latter may rarely cause recurrent syncope. Disproportionate septal amyloid accumulation mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with dynamic left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction16, 17, 18, 19 is rare but well documented. Myocardial ischemia can result from amyloid deposits within the microvasculature.20, 21 Atrial thrombus is common, particularly in AL amyloidosis, sometimes before atrial fibrillation occurs.22 Intracardiac thrombus can embolize, causing transient ischemic attacks or strokes, and may be an early or even presenting feature.23 Anticoagulation is therefore important in the appropriate clinical situation, but careful consideration must be given to patients with extensive systemic AL amyloidosis who may have an elevated bleeding risk due to factor X deficiency or in some cases with gastrointestinal involvement.24 The Table gives an outline of the clinical phenotypes of the common amyloid subtypes.AL AmyloidosisAL amyloidosis is caused by deposition of fibrils composed of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains and is associated with clonal plasma cell or other B‐cell dyscrasias. The spectrum and pattern of organ involvement is very wide, but cardiac involvement occurs in half of cases and is sometimes the only presenting feature.25 Cardiac AL amyloidosis may be rapidly progressive. Low QRS voltages, particularly in the limb leads, are common. Thickening of the LV wall is typically mild to moderate and is rarely >18 mm even in advanced disease. Cardiac AL amyloid deposition is accompanied by marked elevation of the biomarkers BNP and cardiac troponin, even at an early stage. Involvement of the heart is the commonest cause of death in AL amyloidosis and is a major determinant of prognosis; without cardiac involvement, patients with AL amyloidosis have a median survival of around 4 years,26 but the prognosis among affected patients with markedly elevated BNP and cardiac troponin (Mayo stage III disease)27 is on the order of 8 months.Hereditary AmyloidosesMutations in several genes, such as transthyretin, fibrinogen, apolipoprotein A1, and apolipoprotein A2 can be responsible for hereditary amyloidosis, but by far the most common cause is variant ATTR amyloidosis (variant ATTR) caused by mutations in the transthyretin gene causing neuropathy and, often, cardiac involvement.The TTR gene is synthesized in the liver, and several point mutations are described (see the Table), but the most common is the Val122Ile mutation.28, 29 In a large autopsy study that included individuals with cardiac amyloidosis, the TTR Val122Ile allele was present in 3.9% of all African Americans and 23% of African Americans with cardiac amyloidosis. Penetrance of the mutation is not truly known and is associated with a late‐onset cardiomyopathy that is indistinguishable from senile cardiac amyloidosis. Although the prevalence of disease caused by this mutation is unknown, it is almost certainly underdiagnosed, because the wall thickening is often incorrectly attributed to hypertensive heart disease. Neuropathy is not generally a feature of this ATTR due to Val122Ile.Table Table. Summary of Pathology, Presentation, and Management of Different Amyloid TypesAmyloid TypePrecursor ProteinTypical Decade of PresentationCardiac InvolvementOther Organ InvolvementTreatmentPrognosis (Median Survival)Primary (AL) amyloidosisMonoclonal light chain6th or 7th decade (but can be any)40% to 50%Renal, liver, soft tissue, neuropathyChemotherapy or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation48 mo but 8 mo for advanced‐stage diseaseTransthyretin amyloidosisATTR (V30M)Variant transthyretin3rd or 4th decade (but geographical variation)Uncommon (but can occur in older patients)Peripheral and autonomic neuropathyLiver transplantation (younger cases) not proven in othersGood with liver transplantation for V30M progressive diseaseATTR (T60 A)Variant transthyretin6th decadeUp to 90% by diagnosisPeripheral and autonomic neuropathyLiver transplantation possible in selected patientsVariable with liver transplantationWild‐type ATTRWild‐type transthyretin70 y (but remains a consideration after 50 y)Almost all casesCarpal tunnel syndromeSupportive7 to 8 yATTR Ile 122Variant transthyretin6th decade or olderAlmost all casesCarpal tunnel syndromeSupportive7 to 8 yApolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1)Variant apolipoprotein6th decade or olderRarePredominantly renalRenal (±liver) transplantationUsually slowly progressive (y)Secondary (AA) amyloidosisSerum amyloid A (SAA)AnyRareRenal, liverTreat underlying inflammatory conditionGoodAtrial natriuretic peptide (ANP)ANP70 y or olderAll cases but significance uncertainNone reportedNot needed‐More than 100 genetic variants of TTR are associated with amyloidosis. Most present as the clinical syndrome of progressive peripheral and autonomic neuropathy. Unlike wild‐type ATTR or variant ATTR Val122Ile, the features of other variant ATTR include vitreous amyloid deposits or, rarely, deposits in other organs. Cardiac involvement in variant ATTR varies by mutations and can be the presenting or indeed the only clinical feature.30 For example, cardiac involvement is rare in variant ATTR associated with Val30Met (a common variant in Portugal or Sweden), but it is almost universal and develops early in individuals with variant ATTR due to Thr60Ala mutation (a mutation common in Ireland).Mutations in apolipoprotein A1 gene can cause systemic amyloidosis, typically causing renal and hepatic involvement—although cardiac involvement is well recognized.31Senile Systemic Amyloidosis (Wild‐Type ATTR)Wild‐type TTR amyloid deposits are found at autopsy in about 25% of individuals >80 years of age, but their clinical significance has not been clear.32, 33, 34 The prevalence of wild‐type TTR deposits leading to the clinical syndrome of wild‐type ATTR cardiac amyloidosis remains to be ascertained, but the syndrome is distinct and clearly far rarer. Wild‐type ATTR is a predominantly cardiac disease, and the only other significant extracardiac feature is a history of carpal tunnel syndrome, often preceding heart failure by 3 to 5 years.35 Extracardiac involvement is most unusual.Both wild‐type ATTR and ATTR due to Val122Ile are diseases of the >60‐year age group and are often misdiagnosed as hypertensive heart disease.9 Wild‐type ATTR has a strong male predominance, and the natural history remains poorly understood, but studies suggest a median survival of about 7 years from presentation.32, 33 The true incidence of wild‐type ATTR is probably underestimated, and recent developments in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), which have greatly improved detection of cardiac amyloid during life, suggest that wild‐type ATTR is more common than previously thought: It accounted for 0.5% of all patients seen at the UK amyloidosis center until 2001 but now accounts for 7% of 1100 cases with amyloidosis seen since the end of 2009 (unpublished data). There appears to be an association between wild‐type ATTR and history of myocardial infarctions, G/G (Val/Val) exon 24 polymorphism in the alpha2‐macroglobulin (alpha2M), and the H2 haplotype of the tau gene36; the association of tau with Alzheimer's disease raises interesting questions as both are amyloid‐associated diseases of aging. Although the echocardiographic manifestations of cardiac ATTR may be indistinguishable from advanced AL amyloidosis, patients with the former typically have fewer symptoms and better survival.37Other Types of Cardiac AmyloidosisLocalized atrial amyloid deposits derived from atrial natriuretic peptide are associated with atrial fibrillation, notably postoperatively,9, 38 and become ubiquitous with age, being present at autopsy in 80% of people >70 years of age.39, 40 The significance and causality of atrial natriuretic peptide amyloid deposits remain unknown. Amyloid of as yet unknown fibril type is also common in explanted cardiac valves.41, 42 Systemic AA amyloidosis complicating chronic inflammatory diseases, in which the amyloid fibrils are derived from the acute‐phase reactant serum amyloid A protein, involves the heart in about 2% of cases with systemic AA amyloidosis. Incidence of AA amyloidosis is generally in decline, likely reflecting better treatment for rheumatological disorders with biological agents.Diagnosis and Evaluation of Cardiac AmyloidosisElectrocardiographyLow QRS voltages (all limb leads <5 mm in height) with poor R‐wave progression in the chest leads (pseudoinfarction pattern) occur in up to 50% of patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis.43 The combination of low ECG voltage with concentrically increased wall thickness is highly suspicious for cardiac amyloidosis (see Figure 1), but voltage criteria for LV hypertrophy can nevertheless sometimes occur.44 Other findings include first‐degree atrioventricular block (21%), nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (16%), second‐ or third‐degree atrioventricular block (3%), atrial fibrillation/flutter (20%), and ventricular tachycardia (5%).44 Left and right bundle branch block can also occur.18 ECG patterns can provide clues to differentiate between AL and TTR amyloidosis: Left bundle branch block is seen in 40% of patients with wild‐type ATTR but is rare in AL (4%), whereas typical low QRS voltages are seen in 40% wild‐type ATTR versus 60% AL.45 There has been little recent study of ECG correlation with cardiac biomarkers, treatment toxicity, and mortality. Progressive ECG changes may be useful in assessing silent cardiac progression.46 Changes in ECG abnormalities after treatment in AL amyloidosis remain poorly studied but can occur—more often little improvement is seen. Holter ECG monitoring identifies asymptomatic arrhythmias in >75% of cardiac AL patients (mainly supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and some nonsustained ventricular tachycardia).47Download PowerPointFigure 1. ECG of a patient with cardiac AL amyloidosis showing small QRS voltages (defined as ≤6 mm height), predominantly in the limb leads and pseudoinfarction pattern in the anterior leads.EchocardiographyAll patients with suspected amyloidosis should undergo echocardiography. Findings are characteristic in advanced disease but are harder to elicit earlier on and have prognostic as well as diagnostic significance.48, 49, 50 Typical findings include concentric ventricular thickening with right ventricular involvement, poor biventricular long‐axis function with normal/near‐normal ejection fraction,51, 52 and valvular thickening (particularly in wild‐type or variant ATTR).45 Diastolic dysfunction is the earliest echocardiographic abnormality and may occur before cardiac symptoms develop.53, 54 As with all investigations, echocardiography must be interpreted within the clinical context; a speckled or granular myocardial appearance, although characteristic of amyloid, is an inexact finding, which is dependent on machine gain settings. Biatrial dilatation in presence of biventricular, valvular, and interatrial septal thickening 53 is a useful clue to the diagnosis.Advanced echocardiographic techniques are beginning to reveal more about the underlying pathology and functional abnormalities, such as the twisting and untwisting cardiac motion that may be augmented through compensatory mechanisms before reversing to impairment later in the course of the disease.55, 56 Strain and strain rate imaging, derived from speckle tracking (see Figure 2), may help differentiate cardiac amyloidosis from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.57, 58 Typically, there is much greater restriction of basal compared to apical movement. Mean LV basal strain is an independent predictor of both cardiac and overall deaths. Contrast echocardiography using transpulmonary bubble contrast can show microvascular dysfunction in AL amyloidosis.59 Although transesophageal echo may help detect atrial appendage thrombus in a third of cases of AL amyloid, translation of this into routine clinical practice for this frail and unwell patient population needs further study.53, 60Download PowerPointFigure 2. Transthoracic echocardiogram with speckle tracking. The red and yellow lines represent longitudinal motion in the basal segments, whereas the purple and green lines represent apical motion. This shows loss of longitudinal ventricular contraction at the base compared to apex.Cardiac BiomarkersMeasurements of BNP, its more stable N‐terminal fragment (NT‐proBNP), and cardiac troponins are extremely informative in AL amyloidosis, which is the only type in which they have been systematically studied to date. Their value in TTR amyloidosis is yet to be determined. BNP/NT‐proBNP is cleared by the kidneys (BNP also partially cleared by the liver), confounding evaluation of patients with kidney involvement. Elevated NT‐proBNP levels in systemic AL amyloidosis are a sensitive marker of cardiac involvement, with a cutoff >152 pmol/L being associated with higher mortality rate (72% vs 7.6% per year).61 Abnormal NT‐proBNP is predictive of clinically significant cardiac involvement developing in the future.62 BNP/NT‐proBNP in general reflects high filling pressures, but amyloid deposits may have a local effect—BNP granules are found in higher quantities in myocytes adjacent to amyloid deposits.63 Increased troponin concentrations are a marker of poor prognosis,64 but the mechanism remains unclear. High‐sensitivity troponin is abnormal in >90% of cardiac AL patients,65 and the combination of BNP/NT‐proBNP plus troponin measurements is used to stage and risk‐stratify patients with AL amyloidosis at diagnosis.27, 66 Very interestingly, the concentration of BNP/NT‐proBNP in AL amyloidosis may fall dramatically within weeks after chemotherapy that substantially reduces the production of amyloidogenic light chains.67 The basis for this very rapid phenomenon, which is not mirrored by changes on echocardiography or CMR, remains uncertain, but a substantial fall is associated with improved outcomes. An early transient increase in BNP/NT‐proBNP may occur after treatment with the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide, which are frequently used in the management of AL amyloidosis (see later), but the significance and cause are unclear.68, 69Cardiac Magnetic ResonanceCMR provides functional and morphological information on cardiac amyloid in a similar way to echocardiography, though the latter is superior for evaluating and quantifying diastolic abnormalities. An advantage of CMR is in myocardial tissue characterization. Amyloidotic myocardium reveals subtle precontrast abnormalities (T1, T2),70, 71 but extravascular contrast agents based on chelated gadolinium provide the key information. The appearance (see Figure 3) of global, subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement is highly characteristic of cardiac amyloid72, 73 and correlates with prognosis.74, 75 CMR is especially useful in patients with other causes of LV thickening/hypertrophy because it can differentiate amyloidosis from hypertension, which may not be possible by routine echocardiography.Download PowerPointFigure 3. CMR with the classic amyloid global, subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement pattern in the left ventricle with blood and mid‐/epimyocardium nulling together.Difficulties are often encountered, however. For example, arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation and ectopic beats, degrade image quality during CMR, and increasing experience of the technique in clinical practice has shown that the pattern of late gadolinium enhancement can be atypical and patchy, especially in early disease.76 Late gadolinium enhancement imaging in amyloidosis is inherently challenging because amyloid infiltration within the interstitium of the heart reduces the differences in contrast signal between blood and myocardium such that the two compartments may null together or even be reversed and effusions may cause considerable ghosting artifact, although these both can be a strong clue to the underlying diagnosis (see Figure 4).73, 77, 78 Recently, the technique of equilibrium contrast CMR has demonstrated much higher extracellular myocardial volume in cardiac amyloid than any other measured disease.79, 80 It is anticipated that accurate measurements of the expanded interstitium in amyloidosis will prove useful in serial quantification of cardiac amyloid burden.Download PowerPointFigure 4. Sequential static images from a CMR TI scout sequence. As the inversion time (TI) increases, myocardium nulls first (arrow in image 3), followed by blood afterwards (arrow in image 6), implying that there is more gadolinium contrast in the myocardium than blood—a degree of interstitial expansion such that the “myocrit” is smaller than the hematocrit.Radionuclide ImagingSAP component scintigraphy enables visceral amyloid deposits, including those in the liver, kidneys, spleen, adrenal glands, and bones, to be imaged serially in a specific and quantitative manner,81 but it does not adequately image the moving heart. Numerous case reports over the past 30 years have indicated that various commonly used diphosphonate bone‐seeking radionuclide tracers occasionally localize to cardiac amyloid, and this approach has lately been investigated systematically. It transpires that 99mTc‐DPD, a particular tracer that has been little used of late for bone scintigraphy, appears to localize to cardiac amyloid deposits very sensitively, especially in patients with ATTR type (Figure 5). Indeed, asymptomatic cardiac ATTR deposits can be identified through 99mTc‐DPD scintigraphy at an early stage when echocardiography, serum cardiac biomarkers, and perhaps even CMR remain normal.82 By contrast, uptake of 99mTc‐DPD occurs in about one third of patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis, and 99mTc‐DPD‐SPECT‐CT can help to distinguish the two types.82 The sensitivity of DPD scintigraphy for detecting cardiac amyloidosis of TTR type would appear to have considerable potential for diagnosis and screening.83Download PowerPointFigure 5. A positive 99mTc‐DPD scan for TTR cardiac amyloid (left), showing uptake in the heart (arrow) and reduced bone uptake. The right‐hand panel shows a fused CT/SPECT image showing myocardial uptake with greater uptake in the septum.Endomyocardial BiopsyEndomyocardial biopsy has been considered to be the gold standard for demonstrating cardiac amyloid deposition.84 Although cardiac involvement can reasonably be inferred in a patient with proven systemic amyloidosis through a combination of clinical features, ECG, echocardiography, and biomarkers, etc, endomyocardial biopsy is required when suspected cardiac amyloidosis is an isolated feature or when the cardiac amyloid fibril type cannot be identified by other means. In practice, endomyocardial biopsies are most commonly required to differentiate between AL and ATTR in older patients, some 5% of whom have a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.85 Endomyocardial biopsies should be considered in patients with a thickened left ventricle by echocardiography where hypertension, valvular disease, and a family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have been excluded, particularly if the patient is young. Complications such as perforation remain a small but real risk and may not be well tolerated in restrictive cardiomyopathy.86, 87 The presence of amyloid deposition should be confirmed by Congo red staining, and immunohistochemistry can usefully identify fibril type in about 60% to 70% cases (see Figure 6). Electron microscopy to confirm or refute the presence of amyloid fibrils has an occasional role when Congo red stains fail to produce definitive results.88, 89 Proteomic typing of amyloid by mass spectrometry using tiny samples obtained through laser capture microdissection of tissue sections usually provides definitive results90 and is critical when immunohistochemistry has not done so.Download PowerPointFigure 6. An endomyocardial biopsy of a patient with cardiac AL amyloidosis stained as follows: (A) Congo red only; (B) Apple‐green birefringence under polarized light; (C) Congo red with lambda overlay (negative); (D) Congo red with kappa overlay (positive).TreatmentCardiac amyloidosis in general has a poor prognosis, but this differs according to amyloid type and availability and response to therapy. Treatment may be classified as follows: supportive therapy (ie, modified heart‐failure treatment including device therapy); therapies that suppress production of the respective amyloid fibril precursor protein (eg, chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis); and novel strategies to inhibit amyloid fibril formation or to directly target the amyloid deposits or stabilize the precursor protein (especially in ATTR with drugs such as tafamidis or diflunisal). Cardiac transplantation, although rarely feasible, can be very successful in carefully selected patients.Supportive TreatmentStandard heart‐failure therapy may be of limited benefit or even detrimental in cardiac amyloidosis. There is scant evidence for the use (or not) of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or β‐blockers. These may be poorly tolerated and may worsen postural hypotension or renal function. Restrictive cardiomyopathy leads to a heart‐rate–dependent cardiac output in some cases, and some such patients may find difficulty in tolerating β‐blockers. Digitalis and calcium channel blockers may be selectively concentrated in amyloidotic tissue and are relatively contraindicated on grounds of increased toxicity,91, 92, 93 especially the latter, which can lead to rapid worsening. Careful monitoring is needed to avoid significant drug interactions, for example, β‐blockers with thalidomide used in chemotherapy of AL amyloidosis causing bradycardia.94Maintenance of adequate filling pressures is vital because of the restrictive physiology, balancing peripheral edema and renal impairment with salt/water restriction and judicious use of diuretics. Patient education and participation, ideally with backup from a heart failure team, are critical to successful management. Contrary to standard heart failure management, maintenance of adequate blood pressure with an α‐agonist such as midodrine may permit higher doses of loop diuretics, especially in patients with autonomic neuropathy.95Device TherapyPacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators may not prevent sudden cardiac death, because this is thought to often be due to electromechanical dissociation.96 In the absence of evidence, pacing indications remain within current standard guidelines. High defibrillator thresholds may be encountered, and the benefits of such devices remain uncertain.96, 97, 98 Biventricular pacing appears to play little role but may be the ideal pacing option to avoid decompensation of the stiffened ventricle as a result of induced dyssynchrony from right ventricular pacing.99Amyloid‐Specific TreatmentReducing Amyloid Fibril Precursor Protein ProductionTreatment of amyloidosis is currently based on the concept of reducing the supply of the respective amyloid fibril precursor protein. In AL amyloidosis, therapy is directed toward the clonal plasma cells using either cyclical combination chemotherapy or high‐dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Most chemotherapy regimes in AL amyloidosis comprise dexamethasone combined with an alkylator (oral melphalan or others). Addition of thalidomide, for example, in the risk‐adapted cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone regime used widely in the United Kingdom, improves response rates but probably at cost of greater toxicity.100 Dexamethasone, although a very useful agent in all patients with AL amyloidosis, including those with cardiac involvement, has to be used with great caution in patients with cardiac amyloidosis because of a high risk of fluid overload in absence of adequate and rapid changes to diuretic therapy. Close coordination between the treating hematology and cardiology teams is critical to steer the patient successfully through the treatment course.101 High‐dose melphalan followed by autologous stem‐cell transplantation is generally contraindicated in patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis. Although it has been argued that autologous stem cell transplantation is the best treatment for suitable patients,102, 103, 104 its role in the

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call