Abstract

The purpose of this work is to determine which electric field configuration (vertical or horizontal) produces corona emission from raindrops for the lowest ambient electric field. For that, a numerical modeling of the distortion of uncharged raindrops falling at terminal velocity in quiescent air in a horizontal electric field is performed. The results are compared with previous numerical study involving a vertical electric field. It is shown that the fall velocity is quite unaffected by ambient field intensities lower than 200 kV/m. The disruption and the corona onset fields are lower than those corresponding to the vertical field configuration and the larger the drop the larger the difference. For a given altitude the difference between the corona onset fields in both configurations can reach about 100 kV/m; meanwhile for a given ambient field intensity, the difference in altitude of corona emission can rise to about 1 km. These onset field intensities are, though, too high for allowing drop breakup and corona emission from an uncharged drop in permanent field conditions below 12 km height. An estimation of the critical onset field (disruption and/or corona emission) is carried out for charged drops in the horizontal field configuration. For a drop 2 mm in spherical equivalent radius carrying the quarter of its Rayleigh maximum net charge, the critical onset field is approximately equal to 290 kV/m below 7.4 km height and decreases down to 110 kV/m at 10 km. Given that present modeling does not take into account the effect of turbulence that could induce drop oscillations, the critical field intensities calculated here may be considered as upper limits.

Highlights

  • Laboratoire d’Aerologie, UMR CNRS/UPS 5560, Observatoire Midi-Pyrenees, Toulouse, France [1] The purpose of this work is to determine which electric field configuration produces corona emission from raindrops for the lowest ambient electric field

  • Crabb and Latham [1974], Blyth et al [1992], and Blyth et al [1998] showed that glancing collisions involving at least one raindrop can produce long liquid filaments at the tips of which corona is emitted in electric fields down to 150 kV/m [Blyth et al, 1998]

  • [30] The present modeling of raindrop behavior in a horizontal electric field is far from perfect because it does not allow us to describe the hydrodynamic oscillations and vibrations undergone in thundercloud conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

[2] In order to account for the electrostatic processes in meteorological models of cloud convection, the various interactions between cloud microphysics and thunderstorm electrification should be investigated. Georgis et al [1997] have shown that the oscillations undergone by the drops are largely damped by their fall through the still air in a 17 meters height column so that their shape can be compared to that in an equilibrium state We focus this modeling on the equilibrium shape of the drops in order to allow a correct comparison with this experiment and the numerical study in the vertical field configuration by Coquillat and Chauzy [1993, 1994]. According to Beard and Chuang [1987], the cor-

Description of the Method
D CDp CD
B B1 v0BBB1
Findings
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call