Abstract

Marine heat waves instigated by anthropogenic climate change are causing increasingly frequent and severe coral bleaching events that often lead to widespread coral mortality. While community-wide increases in coral mortality following bleaching events have been documented on reefs around the world, the ecological consequences for conspecific individual colonies exhibiting contrasting phenotypes during heat stress (e.g. bleached vs. not bleached) are not well understood. Here we describe the ecological outcomes of the two dominant reef-building coral species in Kāneʻohe Bay, Hawaiʻi, Montipora capitata and Porites compressa, by monitoring the fates of individuals that exhibited either a bleaching susceptible phenotype (bleached) or resistant phenotype (non-bleached) following the second of two consecutive coral bleaching events in Hawaiʻi in 2015. Conspecific pairs of adjacent bleaching susceptible vs. resistant corals were tagged on patch reefs in two regions of Kāneʻohe Bay with different seawater residence times and terrestrial influence. The ecological consequences (symbiont recovery and mortality) were monitored for two years following the peak of the bleaching event. Bleaching susceptible corals suffered higher partial mortality than bleaching resistant corals of the same species in the first 6 months following heat stress. Surprisingly, P. compressa had greater resilience following bleaching (faster pigment recovery and lower post-bleaching mortality) than M. capitata, despite having less resistance to bleaching (higher bleaching prevalence and severity). These differences indicate that bleaching susceptibility of a species is not always a good predictor of mortality following a bleaching event. By tracking the fate of individual colonies of resistant and susceptible phenotypes, contrasting ecological consequences of heat stress were revealed that were undetectable at the population level. Furthermore, this approach revealed individuals that underwent particularly rapid recovery from mortality, including some colonies over a meter in diameter that recovered all live tissue cover from >60% partial mortality within just one year. These coral pairs (44 pairs of each species) continue to be maintained and monitored in the field, serving as a “living library” for future investigations on the ecology and physiology of coral bleaching.

Highlights

  • Ocean warming due to anthropogenic climate change has caused an increase in the frequency and severity of coral bleaching, a visually striking stress response where the coral host expels its endosymbiotic algae revealing the white coral skeleton beneath the translucent animal tissue (Gates et al, 1992; Putnam et al, 2017)

  • Because of coral dependence on this partnership, prolonged heat waves that cause sustained coral bleaching can lead to depletion of the host’s energy supply and reserves (Grottoli et al, 2004; Rodrigues and Grottoli, 2007; Imbs and Yakovleva, 2012; Wall et al, 2019). This stress can elicit a variety of sublethal effects, including declines in growth and reproduction (Ward et al, 2000; Baird and Marshall, 2002; Baker et al, 2008; Hughes et al, 2019a), and at worst can result in widespread coral mortality (Loya et al, 2001; McClanahan, 2004; Baker et al, 2008; Eakin et al, 2010; Hughes et al, 2017; Sully et al, 2019)

  • Coral mortality following bleaching can alter the structure of the coral community itself, as bleaching-susceptible species are lost from the community (Loya et al, 2001; McClanahan, 2004; Baker et al, 2008; Bahr et al, 2017; Hughes et al, 2017) while stress-tolerant species remain (Edmunds, 2018; Hughes et al, 2018b) and “weedy” genera that are better suited for rapid recovery following bleaching become dominant (Darling et al, 2012; Edmunds, 2018)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ocean warming due to anthropogenic climate change has caused an increase in the frequency and severity of coral bleaching, a visually striking stress response where the coral host expels its endosymbiotic algae (dinoflagellates of the family Symbiodiniaceae) revealing the white coral skeleton beneath the translucent animal tissue (Gates et al, 1992; Putnam et al, 2017). Coral mortality following bleaching can alter the structure of the coral community itself, as bleaching-susceptible species are lost from the community (Loya et al, 2001; McClanahan, 2004; Baker et al, 2008; Bahr et al, 2017; Hughes et al, 2017) while stress-tolerant species remain (Edmunds, 2018; Hughes et al, 2018b) and “weedy” genera that are better suited for rapid recovery following bleaching become dominant (Darling et al, 2012; Edmunds, 2018) These changes in community composition alter the ecological function of the reef (Alvarez-Filip et al, 2013), which alongside the structural degradation following bleaching leads to declines in ecosystem goods and services ranging from fisheries production to coastal protection and tourism (Costanza et al, 2014)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call