Abstract
A portrait of a somewhat pale-looking man painted in a style of an artist dead for over 340 years now: “The Next Rembrandt” is an incredibly realistic 3D print work created in 2016 based on data mined from 346 original Rembrandt paintings via algorithm. When the line between man and machine blurs, our existing laws governing inherent anthropocentric rights reach their limits of adequacy — such as copyright protections. Are such algorithm generated works copyright protected and shall they be copyright protected? Do we need to change copyright to protect them? The paper proposes a phase model for copyright protection of such algorithm products de lege lata and a new neighboring right de lege ferenda.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
