Abstract
In the 1990s, collaborative governance emerged as a major public administrative approach for providing a wide array of public services and constraints. A downside to collaborative governance is its potential to create new forms of corruption and expand older ones. Coproduction can promote the public value of "clean" collaborative governance by giving private individuals incentives to combat corruption. Qui tam lawsuits in the United States and jubao ("accusing and reporting") centers in China, despite their limitations, are substantive approaches to the use of the logic of collaborative governance to reward members of the public who expose corruption.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
