Controversies concerning the anatomical definition of the conduction tissues.

Abstract

Conduction across the atrioventricular junctions had long been controversial, with arguments raging as to whether such conduction was myogenic or neurogenic. The landmark study of Tawara in 1906 established the existence of an axis of histologically specialized myocardial cells contained within fibrous sheaths as being responsible for rapid conduction from the atrial to the ventricular myocardium. Keith and Flack then demonstrated that the atrial impulse was generated in the sinus node, with subsequent slowing within the atrioventricular node of Tawara. The detailed reviews of Aschoff and Monckeberg then emphasized the morphological features that permit unequivocal recognition of the nodes, along with rapidly conducting tracts. It is now pertinent that we remember these original criteria for anatomical recognition as we discuss the steps involved in the development of these conducting structures from their embryologic primordiums. In this review, we restate the criteria of Aschoff and Monckeberg, then discuss their relevance to the developmental issues, emphasizing that all myocardial cells have the potential to conduct. The important issues, therefore, are the changes that occur as the heart itself changes from a solitary muscular tube, already possessing the capacity t generate an electrocardiogram, to the four-chambered structure we recognize in postnatal life.