Abstract
BackgroundBecause pain often signals the occurrence of potential tissue damage, a nociceptive stimulus has the capacity to involuntarily capture attention and take priority over other sensory inputs. Whether distraction by nociception actually occurs may depend upon the cognitive characteristics of the ongoing activities. The present study tested the role of working memory in controlling the attentional capture by nociception.Methodology and Principal FindingsParticipants performed visual discrimination and matching tasks in which visual targets were shortly preceded by a tactile distracter. The two tasks were chosen because of the different effects the involvement of working memory produces on performance, in order to dissociate the specific role of working memory in the control of attention from the effect of general resource demands. Occasionally (i.e. 17% of the trials), tactile distracters were replaced by a novel nociceptive stimulus in order to distract participants from the visual tasks. Indeed, in the control conditions (no working memory), reaction times to visual targets were increased when the target was preceded by a novel nociceptive distracter as compared to the target preceded by a frequent tactile distracter, suggesting attentional capture by the novel nociceptive stimulus. However, when the task required an active rehearsal of the visual target in working memory, the novel nociceptive stimulus no longer induced a lengthening of reaction times to visual targets, indicating a reduction of the distraction produced by the novel nociceptive stimulus. This effect was independent of the overall task demands.Conclusion and SignificanceLoading working memory with pain-unrelated information may reduce the ability of nociceptive input to involuntarily capture attention, and shields cognitive processing from nociceptive distraction. An efficient control of attention over pain is best guaranteed by the ability to maintain active goal priorities during achievement of cognitive activities and to keep pain-related information out of task settings.
Highlights
Pain is more than the subjective experience of unpleasantness associated with a somatic sensation
Loading working memory with pain-unrelated information may reduce the ability of nociceptive input to involuntarily capture attention, and shields cognitive processing from nociceptive distraction
An efficient control of attention over pain is best guaranteed by the ability to maintain active goal priorities during achievement of cognitive activities and to keep pain-related information out of task settings
Summary
Pain is more than the subjective experience of unpleasantness associated with a somatic sensation. Further studies have shown that the ‘‘attentional’’ context in which the nociceptive stimulus is delivered (i.e., its salience and its relevance), rather than pain per se, determines how ongoing activities are disrupted (see [2,5]). Building on this notion, an over-responsive disruptive function of pain has been incriminated in the persistence of chronic pain states in patients who tend to become increasingly attentive to pain-related information [6]. The present study tested the role of working memory in controlling the attentional capture by nociception
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have