Abstract

In situ upper-air measurements are often made with instruments attached to weather balloons launched at the surface and lifted into the stratosphere. Present-day balloon-borne sensors allow near-continuous measurements from the Earth's surface to about 35 km (3-5 hPa), where the balloons burst and their instrument payloads descend with parachutes. It has been demonstrated that ascending weather balloons can perturb the air measured by very sensitive humidity and temperature sensors trailing behind them, particularly in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS). The use of controlled balloon descent for such measurements has therefore been investigated and is described here. We distinguish between the single balloon technique that uses a simple automatic valve system to release helium from the balloon at a preset ambient pressure, and the double balloon technique that uses a carrier balloon to lift the payload and a parachute balloon to control the descent of instruments after the carrier balloon is released at preset altitude. The automatic valve technique has been used for several decades for water vapor soundings with frost point hygrometers, whereas the double balloon technique has recently been re-established and deployed to measure radiation and temperature profiles through the atmosphere. Double balloon soundings also strongly reduce pendulum motion of the payload, stabilizing radiation instruments during ascent. We present the flight characteristics of these two ballooning techniques and compare the quality of temperature and humidity measurements made during ascent and descent.

Highlights

  • Weather balloons have been used for climate and meteorological research for more than 100 years

  • The spikes represent large measurement errors that greatly exceed the 2 % precision and accuracy limits prescribed by GRUAN (GCOS-112, 2007)

  • For these reasons frost point hygrometer (FPH) measurements made during controlled descent are preferable to ascent measurements in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Weather balloons have been used for climate and meteorological research for more than 100 years. A. Kräuchi et al.: Controlled weather balloon ascents and descents for atmospheric research frost point hygrometer (FPH) record of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) at Boulder, Colorado (40◦, 105◦ W), shows the significant variability of UTLS water vapor on interannual and longer timescales (Hurst et al, 2011). Kräuchi et al.: Controlled weather balloon ascents and descents for atmospheric research frost point hygrometer (FPH) record of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) at Boulder, Colorado (40◦, 105◦ W), shows the significant variability of UTLS water vapor on interannual and longer timescales (Hurst et al, 2011) This long data record is limited to only one location in the northern midlatitudes and should not be used to assess global trends. In the following we discuss in detail the contamination problems of ascent measurements, demonstrate some advantages and disadvantages of controlled ascent and descent measurements and compare temperature and humidity profiles obtained during traditional (burst) and controlled descents

Traditional ballooning and associated problems
Temperature measurement contamination
Humidity measurement contamination
Novel ballooning techniques
Automatic valve technique
Double balloon technique
Advantages and disadvantages of controlled balloon descent
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call