Abstract

Some plants have betterbuilt-in disturbance rejection capabilities than others, that is, their dynamic resilience (controllability) with respect to disturbance rejection is better. In the paper we consider controller independent disturbance measures for six classes of problems: 1. Open-loop disturbance sensitivity. 2. Disturbance sensitivity for decentralized control. 3. Disturbance sensitivity for system under partial control. 4. Input magnitude for rejecting disturbances. 5. Output magnitude for disturbances in the presence of input limitations. 6. Maximum disturbance range. For all six problems we obtain frequency-dependent measures, and appropriate scaling of the variables is crucial for interpreting these measures. In the paper we also discuss the relationship between these measures and the Relative Disturbance Gain (RDG) of McAvoy and coworkers and the disturbance condition number of Skogestad and Morari.

Highlights

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call