Contrasting hydrological responses to climate change in two adjacent catchments dominated by karst and nonkarst

Abstract

Karst systems are well-known for their special features, such as epikarst zone and quick flow, compared to other hydrological systems. However, few studies explored the difference in hydrological responses to climate change between karst and nonkarst catchments. In this paper, two adjacent catchments dominated by karst and nonkarst in Southwest China (subtropical monsoon climate) were selected to investigate their different hydrological behaviors under future climates. To account for potential model structure uncertainties, three different karst hydrological models and three traditional catchment models were used to simulate these two catchments. The results demonstrate that different models yield comparable streamflow simulations within each catchment, allowing for the focus to be on the impact of climate change and catchment hydrological characteristics. The karst-dominated catchment is modeled to have larger actual evapotranspiration (AET) than the nonkarst-dominated catchment under similar climate conditions, with the AET of the former being more sensitive to changes in precipitation and potential evapotranspiration. These differences are primarily due to the presence of the epikarst in the unsaturated zone of the karst system, which can store more infiltration rainwater for evapotranspiration. Both catchments are expected to experience a wetter projection in the wet season and a drier projection in the dry season in the future. However, the karst-dominated catchment will face a drier climate with a significant increase in precipitation in just two months (July and August). Additionally, because of a higher sensitivity of monthly AET to climate change, the karst-dominated catchment will experience a greater monthly discharge reduction in the first two wet months (April and May), a relatively lower discharge increase in other wet months, and a lower monthly discharge in dry months, while the monthly discharge of the nonkarst-dominated catchment increases in the wet season and decrease in the dry season. Furthermore, the karst-dominated catchment will have a much lower annual discharge than the nonkarst-dominated catchment, particularly during extremely dry years in the future period due to its larger AET consumption. These all suggest that the karst-dominated catchment will be more vulnerable to droughts. Overall, due to the drier climate and the different hydrological backgrounds of the karst-dominated catchment, it is expected to have much drier hydrological conditions in the future compared to the nonkarst-dominated catchment.