Abstract
The contrast of secondary electron images of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are compared with that of scanning ion microscopy (SIM) for metals. The dependence of the secondary electron yields on atomic number in SEM is opposite to that in SIM. The secondary electron yields for electron bombardment increases with atomic number for metals, while those for ion bombardment decreases with increasing atomic number. The origins of those phenomena are discussed on the basis of the range profiles of both particles respect to the surface.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.