Abstract
This article critically examines the objectives and practical operation of Australia's mandatory data breach notification [MDBN] law. We find that the scope and application of Australia's law do not reflect the legislative objectives underpinning the law. The wording of the law is ambiguous, and it is beset by conceptual inconsistencies. The law also fails to adequately consider the needs of individuals whose personal information has been compromised in a data breach. As a result, Australia's MDBN law is unlikely to meet the needs of organisations that have experienced a data breach, or of individuals who are notified. We conclude by identifying options for reform to better reflect the law's rationale and to better achieve its objectives. Comparisons are made with similar laws in force in the United States and with the General Data Protection Regulation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Computer Law & Security Review: The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
