Abstract
The article highlights the problems of contractual and tort liability for auxiliaries. In the light of historical and comparative legal approaches, the issues of the formation and development of the doctrine of liability for dependent assistants (accomplices) are considered, the conditions and grounds for its imposition are analyzed, and the specified liability regime in contract and tort law is compared. The author comes to the conclusion that at the moment there is no adequate dogmatic justification of liability for acts of others, and the differences between contractual and tort liability for auxiliaries are largely beginning to blur.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
