Continuous versus Pulsatile Flow in 24-Hour Vascularized Composite Allograft Machine Perfusion in Swine: A Pilot Study

Abstract

IntroductionMultiple perfusion systems have been investigated on vascularized composite allografts, with various temperatures and different preservation solutions, most using continuous flow (CF). However, physiological flow is pulsatile and provides better outcomes in kidney and lung ex vivo perfusions. The objective of this pilot study is to compare pulsatile flow (PF) with CF in our 24-h subnormothermic machine perfusion protocol for swine hindlimbs. MethodsPartial hindlimbs were harvested from Yorkshire pigs and perfused with a modified Steen solution at 21°C for 24 h either with CF (n = 3) or with pulsatile flow (PF) at 60 beats/min (n = 3). Perfusion parameters, endothelial markers, and muscle biopsies were assessed at different timepoints. ResultsOverall, lactate levels were significantly lower in the PF group (P = 0.001). Glucose uptake and potassium concentration were similar in both groups throughout perfusion. Total nitric oxide levels were significantly higher in the PF group throughout perfusion (P = 0.032). Nitric oxide/endothelin-1 ratio also tends to be higher in the PF group, reflecting a potentially better vasoconductivity with PF, although not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.095). Arterial resistances were higher in the PF group (P < 0.001). Histological assessment did not show significant difference in muscular injury between the two groups. Weight increased quicker in the CF group but reached similar values with the PF after 24 h. ConclusionsThis pilot study suggests that PF may provide superior preservation of vascularized composite allografts when perfused for 24 h at subnormothermic temperatures, with potential improvement in endothelial function and decreased ischemic injury.