Abstract

The contribution of lateral parietal regions such as the angular gyrus to human episodic memory has been the subject of much debate following widespread observations of left parietal activity in healthy volunteers during functional neuroimaging studies of memory retrieval. Patients with lateral parietal lesions are not amnesic, but recent evidence indicates that their memory abilities may not be entirely preserved. Whereas recollection appears intact when objective measures such as source accuracy are used, patients often exhibit reduced subjective confidence in their accurate recollections. When asked to recall autobiographical memories, they may produce spontaneous narratives that lack richness and specificity, but can remember specific details when prompted. Two distinct theoretical accounts have been proposed to explain these results: that the patients have a deficit in the bottom-up capturing of attention by retrieval output, or that they have an impairment in the subjective experience of recollection. The present study aimed to differentiate between these accounts using continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) in healthy participants to disrupt function of specific left parietal subregions, including angular gyrus. Inconsistent with predictions of the attentional theory, angular gyrus cTBS did not result in greater impairment of free recall than cued recall. Supporting predictions of the subjective recollection account, temporary disruption of angular gyrus was associated with highly accurate source recollection accuracy but a selective reduction in participants’ rated source confidence. The findings are consistent with a role for angular gyrus in the integration of memory features into a conscious representation that enables the subjective experience of remembering.

Highlights

  • The left lateral parietal lobe consistently exhibits activity during neuroimaging studies of long-term memory retrieval [1]

  • We identified a causal relationship between the angular gyrus (AnG) sub-region of the left lateral parietal lobe and the subjective experience of recollection, whereby temporarily disrupting the left AnG with continuous theta burst stimulation diminished participants’ rated confidence in their accurate source recollection judgments

  • The results converge with previous neuropsychological studies suggesting that the lateral parietal lobe is not necessary for accurate recollection, since parietal lesion patients show intact performance on tasks that measure objective aspects of memory, such as recognition [3,5,8,18], source accuracy [3,4,5], and cued recall [3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The left lateral parietal lobe consistently exhibits activity during neuroimaging studies of long-term memory retrieval [1]. Parietal lesion patients do show significantly reduced confidence when judging the context in which an item was previously encountered, with confidence in other aspects of memory unimpaired [5] They produce fewer subjective ‘remember’ responses on remember/know tasks [3], and exhibit diminished spontaneous recall of autobiographical memory details [2,3]. One account of these findings is that patients with lateral parietal lesions may have a deficit in the bottom-up capturing of attention by retrieval output [6,7], whereas another view is that patients’ subjective experience of recollection may be impaired, leaving objective recollection accuracy intact [5,8,9]. Patient lesions are rarely restricted to a single, circumscribed region, tending to involve both dorsal and ventral parietal areas, the amount of remote dysfunction (i.e., diaschisis) can be difficult to determine, and long-term brain damage may lead to functional reorganisation

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.