Abstract

Formation of centromeric heterochromatin in fission yeast requires the combined action of chromatin modifying enzymes and small RNAs derived from centromeric transcripts. Positive feedback mechanisms that link the RNAi pathway and the Clr4/Suv39h1 histone H3K9 methyltransferase complex (Clr-C) result in requirements for H3K9 methylation for full siRNA production and for siRNA production to achieve full histone methylation. Nonetheless, it has been proposed that the Argonaute protein, Ago1, is the key initial trigger for heterochromatin assembly via its association with Dicer-independent “priRNAs.” The RITS complex physically links Ago1 and the H3-K9me binding protein Chp1. Here we exploit an assay for heterochromatin assembly in which loss of silencing by deletion of RNAi or Clr-C components can be reversed by re-introduction of the deleted gene. We showed previously that a mutant version of the RITS complex (Tas3WG) that biochemically separates Ago1 from Chp1 and Tas3 proteins permits maintenance of heterochromatin, but prevents its formation when Clr4 is removed and re-introduced. Here we show that the block occurs with mutants in Clr-C, but not mutants in the RNAi pathway. Thus, Clr-C components, but not RNAi factors, play a more critical role in assembly when the integrity of RITS is disrupted. Consistent with previous reports, cells lacking Clr-C components completely lack H3K9me2 on centromeric DNA repeats, whereas RNAi pathway mutants accumulate low levels of H3K9me2. Further supporting the existence of RNAi–independent mechanisms for establishment of centromeric heterochromatin, overexpression of clr4+ in clr4Δago1Δ cells results in some de novo H3K9me2 accumulation at centromeres. These findings and our observation that ago1Δ and dcr1Δ mutants display indistinguishable low levels of H3K9me2 (in contrast to a previous report) challenge the model that priRNAs trigger heterochromatin formation. Instead, our results indicate that RNAi cooperates with RNAi–independent factors in the assembly of heterochromatin.

Highlights

  • Eukaryotic genomes are characterized by domains of transcriptionally permissive euchromatin and relatively transcriptionally inert heterochromatin

  • We have sought to define the precise steps leading to heterochromatin assembly using fission yeast as the model system

  • Current models suggest that small RNAs initiate heterochromatin assembly by targeting the RNA interference (RNAi) machinery and subsequently the Clr4/Suv39h1 histone H3K9 methyltransferase complex (Clr-C) chromatin-modifying complex to the centromere

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Eukaryotic genomes are characterized by domains of transcriptionally permissive euchromatin and relatively transcriptionally inert heterochromatin. In fission yeast constitutive heterochromatin assembles at the centromeres, telomeres and the mating type locus. In fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), methylation of H3 K9 is carried out by a single enzyme, Clr (the homolog of Suvar enzymes in higher eukaryotes), which is responsible for mono, di and trimethylation of H3K9 [1]. This mark is in turn bound by proteins bearing a chromodomain, including the HP1 homologs Swi and Chp, and importantly, Clr itself, leading to models for perpetuation and spreading of heterochromatin [2,3,4,5]. Chp is a component of the RITS complex (RNA-induced initiation of transcriptional silencing complex), which is critical for the accumulation of heterochromatin at centromeres [7,8]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call