Abstract
This response to Professor Gaski's commentary first clarifies the editorial background for the development of the set of Journal of Public Policy & Marketing essays titled “The Sages Speak,” which appeared in the Spring 2005 issue. It then goes on to discuss three related issues: (1) the unrest about marketing scholarship that is currently gripping the academy, (2) the need for inclusion of an aggregate perspective in the official American Marketing Association definition of the field of marketing, and (3) the risks of an overreliance on a philosophy of “consequentialism” for the field.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
