Abstract
This paper contributes to the debate over the relevance of contestability by demonstrating that the welfare properties claimed by proponents depend on the inability of incumbent firms to divide the market. Given the ability to divide the market using two-part prices, the incumbent can protect profitability. This possibility further illustrates the extremity of the assumptions upon which contestability rests as two-part pricing is commonly observed in some of the very markets that might be suggested to be more nearly contestable.
Full Text
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call