Abstract

In this article, I would like to reframe our understanding of the role played by doxographies or classification of views (Skt. siddhānta, Ch. panjiao 判教, Tib. grub mtha’) in the Buddhist tradition as it pertained to Tibetan attempts at defining and organizing the diversity of Buddhist contemplative practices that made their way into Tibet since the introduction of Buddhism to the Tibetan plateau in the seventh century, all the way up to the collapse of the Tibetan Empire in the ninth century. In order to do that, this article focuses on one such doxography, the Lamp for the Eye in Meditation (bsam gtan mig sgron), composed in the 10th century by the Tibetan scholar Nupchen Sangyé Yeshé. The first part of the article will place Nupchen’s text in the larger historical and intellectual context of the literary genre of doxographies in India, China, and Tibet. The second part of the article will argue that Nupchen used the doxographical genre not only as a vehicle for organizing and articulating doctrinal and contemplative diversity, but also as a tool for the construction of a new and original system of Tibetan Buddhist practice known as ‘the Great Perfection’ (rdzogs chen). Finally, and as a small homage to the recent passing of the great religious studies scholar Jonathan Z. Smith, I would also like to reflect on the importance that the issues of definition, comparison, and classification—central concerns of Nupchen’s as well as of Smith’s works—have in creating and articulating religious difference.

Highlights

  • I would like to expand our understanding of the role of doxographies in the Buddhist tradition by examining Tibetan attempts at defining and organizing the diversity of Buddhist contemplative practices that made their way into Tibet since the introduction of Buddhism on the Tibetan plateau in the seventh century, all the way up to the collapse of the Tibetan Empire in the ninth century

  • Later Buddhist doxographies will differ in content as well as in structure, there is no doubt that we find in Bhavaviveka the foundation for a new way of thinking within the Indian Buddhist tradition

  • For Smith, “Comparisons are not a given, they are the result of thought . . . comparison does not necessary tell us how things ‘are’ . . . like models and metaphors, comparisons tells us how things might be redescribed”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In his study opf athrtes doifvAerssiiaty(Ionfdciao,nNteemppall,aCtiveentpraral cAtiscieas, Cthhaitnhaa) dduarrirnivgetdheineTariblyetinfrtroomduvcatriioonusof Buddhism to the arts of Asia (IndiaT,ibNeetapnalp, lCateenaturabl eAtwsieae, nCthhineas)evdeunrtinhganthdetheaernlyinitnhtrcoednutuctriioens, oHfeBrbuedrdthGisumenttohethr emade the following ibetan plateau betnwoeteewn othrtehsyerveemntahrka:nd the ninth centuries, Herbert Guenther made the following oteworthy remark: While it will be readily admitted that ‘meditation’ has always played a major role in what is. I would like to expand our understanding of the role of doxographies in the Buddhist tradition by examining Tibetan attempts at defining and organizing the diversity of Buddhist contemplative practices that made their way into Tibet since the introduction of Buddhism on the Tibetan plateau in the seventh century, all the way up to the collapse of the Tibetan Empire in the ninth century.

Doxographies
Indian Precedents
Chinese Precedents
Early Tibetan Classifications
Bodhisattva Outward Tantra
Nupchen Sangye Yeshe
Defining and Comparing
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call