Abstract
This paper explores the causal explanations offered by the client, consultee, and consultant in a typical unsuccessful consultation. These causal explanations are examined in the context of attribution theory and research, and an attempt is made to show that biased attributions are often made by consultants as well as by consultees and clients. These biased attributions are discussed in terms of a cognitive-perceptual framework rather than the traditional motivation based “defensiveness” framework. Finally, implications of this cognitive attribution analysis for consultation practice are presented.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
