Abstract
China plays an important role in the global basic education of mathematics. Moreover, China has a lot of educational experience and methods and trains many excellent talents in the field of mathematics. However, there are still various disadvantages in the process of mathematics teaching. The traditional exam-oriented education makes the talent thought of mathematics education lack openness. Teachers also focus on difficult problems, partial questions, and exam questions during teaching. When teaching, teachers cannot contact students' daily life, which has low value. Mathematics teaching methods are too rigid and lack attraction. Most teachers focus on contents in textbooks while students cannot understand the value of mathematics in learning. This results in the decline of most students' interest in mathematics courses. To solve this problem, mathematical modeling teaching is put forward. China has a short application time in this field, and mathematical modeling is complex and systematic. When dealing with mathematical modeling problems, we must be able to skillfully use the basic knowledge learned and also involve the knowledge of other disciplines, so we must realize the integration of the knowledge of various disciplines. In addition, mathematical modeling teaching attaches great importance to students' communication ability, mathematical interpretation ability, and teamwork ability. Teachers can improve students' ability; however, our teachers' abilities in mathematical modeling teaching are uneven and there are no relevant standards. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an evaluation index system to accurately judge teachers' abilities. Based on this, this study uses the Delphi AHP method to construct the evaluation index system and selects four criteria level indexes and 12 index level indexes to judge teachers' mathematical modeling teaching ability.
Highlights
At present, China’s education reform has entered a new period, with a variety of new education and teaching modes, and the emergence of Delphi and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) speeds up the pace of education reform. is method can more accurately evaluate the weight, importance, and role of various indicators in the process of mathematical modeling teaching. rough mathematical modeling teaching, students’ mathematical ability and thinking ability can be strengthened
The current mainstream statistical algorithm Delphi and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) are used to establish the evaluation index system of mathematical modeling teaching, which enriches the field of teaching modeling evaluation, promotes the sustainable development of this field, and formulates the corresponding judgment standards to measure the evaluation of mathematical modeling teaching
A variety of practical evaluation tools are designed from the perspective of students, focusing on students’ modeling ability and cultivating students’ personal quality. is study focuses on mathematical modeling teaching and selects criteria level indicators for modeling topic selection, teaching monitoring, modeling process, and cooperative learning. e indicators on the indicator level mainly include appropriateness, development, attraction, strategy guidance, quality supervision, comprehensive evaluation, model establishment, model solving, model improvement, component team, clear division of labor, and effective cooperation, with a total of 12 indicators
Summary
China’s education reform has entered a new period, with a variety of new education and teaching modes, and the emergence of Delphi and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) speeds up the pace of education reform. is method can more accurately evaluate the weight, importance, and role of various indicators in the process of mathematical modeling teaching. rough mathematical modeling teaching, students’ mathematical ability and thinking ability can be strengthened. Is method can more accurately evaluate the weight, importance, and role of various indicators in the process of mathematical modeling teaching. At present, most of the research is on mathematical modeling teaching for middle school students, college students, and graduate students, and there is less content on evaluating mathematical modeling teaching [1]. It is urgent to use the most advanced methods to evaluate the quality of teaching modeling. Is is used to judge the teaching quality and future development direction of the mathematical modeling in schools and colleges. When analyzing the teaching ability of mathematical modeling in colleges and universities, this study starts from four aspects, namely, modeling options, teaching monitoring, modeling process, and cooperative learning. Is ideological index is used as the criterion layer of the evaluation index system of mathematical modeling teaching established in this study and further defines the 12 indexes of the index layer.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
