Abstract

Understanding how different plant species and functional types "invest" carbon and nutrients is a major goal of plant ecologists. Two measures of such investments are "construction costs" (carbon needed to produce each gram of tissue) and associated "payback times" for photosynthesis to recover construction costs. These measurements integrate among traits used to assess leaf-trait scaling relationships. Carnivorous plants are model systems for examining mechanisms of leaf-trait coordination, but no studies have measured simultaneously construction costs of carnivorous traps and their photosynthetic rates to determine payback times of traps. We measured mass-based construction costs (CC(mass)) and photosynthesis (A(mass)) for traps, leaves, roots, and rhizomes of 15 carnivorous plant species grown under greenhouse conditions. There were highly significant differences among species in CC(mass) for each structure. Mean CC(mass) of carnivorous traps (1.14 ± 0.24 g glucose/g dry mass) was significantly lower than CC(mass) of leaves of 267 noncarnivorous plant species (1.47 ± 0.17), but all carnivorous plants examined had very low A(mass) and thus, long payback times (495-1551 h). Our results provide the first clear estimates of the marginal benefits of botanical carnivory and place carnivorous plants at the "slow and tough" end of the universal spectrum of leaf traits.

Highlights

  • Understanding how different plant species and functional types “invest” carbon and nutrients is a major goal of plant ecologists

  • Understanding how the investment of carbon and mineral nutrients varies in different plant organs and among species, plant functional types, and the vegetation of different biomes is a major goal for plant ecology (Wright et al, 2004)

  • All the carnivorous plants examined in this study had low mean maximal net photosynthesis when expressed on a mass basis (Amass range = 1.1–64.0 nmol CO2⋅g−1⋅s−1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding how different plant species and functional types “invest” carbon and nutrients is a major goal of plant ecologists Two measures of such investments are “construction costs” (carbon needed to produce each gram of tissue) and associated “payback times” for photosynthesis to recover construction costs. We provide for the first time a simultaneous assessment of both the costs and benefits of botanical carnivory These data allow us to further assess trade-offs between allocation of nutrients to structural tissues and their immediate use for enhancing photosynthesis; i.e., to test Shipley et al.’s (2006) proposed mechanism underlying the universal spectrum of leaf economics

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.